Effect of turbulence and devolatilization models on coal gasification simulation in an entrained-flow gasifier

被引:140
作者
Silaen, Armin [1 ]
Wang, Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, Energy Convers & Conservat Ctr, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
关键词
Gasification modeling; Entrained-flow gasifier; Clean coal technology; Syngas production; Multiphase flow; CHEMICAL PERCOLATION MODEL; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.047
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Numerical simulations of the oxygen-blown coal gasification process inside a generic entrained-flow gasifier are carried out. The Eulerian-Lagrangian approach Is applied to solve the Navier-Stokes equations and the particle dynamics Seven species transport equations are solved with three heterogeneous global reactions and two homogeneous reactions. Finite rates are used for the heterogeneous solid-to-gas reactions. Both finite rate and eddy-dissipation combustion models are calculated for each homogeneous gas-to-gas reaction. and the smaller of the two rates is used Four different devolatilization models are employed and compared The Kobayashi model produces slower devolatilization rate than the other models. The constant rate model produces the fastest devolatilization rate. The single rate model and the chemical percolation model produce moderate and consistent devolatilization rate. Slower devolatilization rate produces higher exit gas temperature and higher CO and CO2 mass fractions, but lower H-2 and heating value. and hence, achieves lower gasification efficiency. Combustion of volatiles is modeled with two-stage global reactions with an intermediate stage via benzene Turbulence models significantly affect the simulated results. Among five turbulence models employed. the standard k-epsilon and the RSM models give consistent results The time scale for employing stochastic time tracking of particles also affects simulated result. Caution has to be exerted to select the appropriate time constant value. Smaller particles have a higher surface/volume ratio and react faster than larger particles. However, large particles possessing higher inertia could impinge on the opposing jet and change the thermal-flow filed and the reaction rates. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2074 / 2091
页数:18
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 19 ANN INT PITTSB
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, US GUID
[3]   KINETICS OF THERMAL DECOMPOSITION OF PULVERIZED COAL PARTICLES [J].
BADZIOCH, S ;
HAWKSLEY, PG .
INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY PROCESS DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, 1970, 9 (04) :521-&
[4]   PREDICTING COMBUSTION BEHAVIOUR OF COAL PARTICLES [J].
BAUM, MM ;
STREET, PJ .
COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1971, 3 (05) :231-&
[5]  
CHEN C, 2000, CHEM ENG SCI, V55, P3833
[6]  
Choudhury D., 1993, INTRO RENORMALIZATIO
[7]   RATE OF COMBUSTION OF SIZE-GRADED FRACTIONS OF CHAR FROM A LOW-RANK COAL BETWEEN 1200 DEGREES K AND 2000 DEGREES K [J].
FIELD, MA .
COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 1969, 13 (03) :237-&
[8]   CHEMICAL PERCOLATION MODEL FOR DEVOLATILIZATION .3. DIRECT USE OF C-13 NMR DATA TO PREDICT EFFECTS OF COAL TYPE [J].
FLETCHER, TH ;
KERSTEIN, AR ;
PUGMIRE, RJ ;
SOLUM, MS ;
GRANT, DM .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1992, 6 (04) :414-431
[9]   CHEMICAL PERCOLATION MODEL FOR DEVOLATILIZATION .2. TEMPERATURE AND HEATING RATE EFFECTS ON PRODUCT YIELDS [J].
FLETCHER, TH ;
KERSTEIN, AR ;
PUGMIRE, RJ ;
GRANT, DM .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1990, 4 (01) :54-60
[10]   CHEMICAL-MODEL OF COAL DEVOLATILIZATION USING PERCOLATION LATTICE STATISTICS [J].
GRANT, DM ;
PUGMIRE, RJ ;
FLETCHER, TH ;
KERSTEIN, AR .
ENERGY & FUELS, 1989, 3 (02) :175-186