Validity of self-reported body weight and height among women including patients with eating disorders

被引:19
作者
Ciarapica, D. [1 ]
Mauro, B. [1 ]
Zaccaria, M. [1 ]
Cannella, C. [1 ]
Polito, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Food & Nutr Natl Res Inst, I-00178 Rome, Italy
关键词
Weight; height; body mass index; self-reported anthropometry; accuracy; eating disorder; overweight; nutritional status; BULIMIA-NERVOSA; MASS INDEX; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/BF03325282
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of self-reported weight and height among women with eating disorders. The study sample consisted of 271 women aged 18-50 yrs: 73 anorexic patients (AN) with a body mass index (BMI) of <18.50 kg/m(2), 54 normal weight bulimic or rehabilitated patients (BU/RE: 18.5<BMI<25), 38 overweight/obese women (OW/OB: BMI >= 25 kg/m(2)) and 106 normal weight women without an eating disorder (NW: 18.5<BMI<25). Their self-reported body weight (BW) and height were recorded during an interview, and measured using standard procedures, and their self-reported and measured BMI was calculated (kg/m(2)). In comparison with the measured data, the AN patients tended to overestimate their body weight by 0.48 +/- 2.05 kg (p<0.05), whereas the OW/OB and BU/RE patients underestimated it (OW/OB: -1.52 +/- 3.21 kg, p=0.006; BU/RE: -1.12 +/- 2.60 kg, p=0.003). All of the groups overestimated height by at least 1 cm, and the OW/OB group overestimated it by 2.31 +/- 2.94 (p=0.00000). These differences were reflected in the significant underestimate of BMI by all groups except the AN patients. Pearson's correlation coefficients between the self-reported and measured variables ranged from 0.95 to 0.98. The results of a Bland & Altman analysis showed that the underestimates of weight and BMI were related to the magnitude of the values (BW: r=-0.24, p<0.000078; BMI: r=-0.37, p<0.00000), the differences being greater with increasing values of weight and BMI; sensitivity as greater for the AN patients. The self-reported data led to a significant misclassification of body mass categories, especially among the BU/RE and OW/OB subjects. Our results show that the over-reporting of height and under-reporting of body weight led to significant underestimates of BMI. The AN subjects seemed to know their weight quite well, whereas the BU/RE and OW/OB women significantly underestimated it. On the basis of these findings, measured weight and height should always be preferred to self-reported values. (Eating Weight Disord. 15: e74-e80, 2010). (C)2010, Editrice Kurtis
引用
收藏
页码:E74 / E80
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Akhtar-Danesh Noori, 2008, Open Med, V2, pe83
[2]   Comparison of patients with bulimia nervosa, obese patients with binge eating disorder, and nonobese patients with binge eating disorder [J].
Barry, DT ;
Grilo, CM ;
Masheb, RM .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 2003, 191 (09) :589-594
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]   Socioeconomic differentials in misclassification of height, weight and body mass index based on questionnaire data [J].
Bostrom, G ;
Diderichsen, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 26 (04) :860-866
[5]   Assessment of bulimia nervosa:: A comparison of interview and self-report questionnaire methods [J].
Carter, JC ;
Aimé, AA ;
Mills, JS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2001, 30 (02) :187-192
[6]  
CLARK V, 1980, J AM DIET ASSOC, V76, P172
[7]   Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight: Implications for obesity research among young adults [J].
Danubio, Maria Enrica ;
Miranda, Gaetano ;
Vinciguerra, Maria Giulia ;
Vecchi, Elvira ;
Rufo, Fabrizio .
ECONOMICS & HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2008, 6 (01) :181-190
[8]   Accuracy of self-reported body weight, height and waist circumference in a Dutch overweight working population [J].
Dekkers, Johanna C. ;
van Wier, Marieke F. ;
Hendriksen, Ingrid J. M. ;
Twisk, Jos W. R. ;
van Mechelen, Willem .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[9]  
DEROGATIS LR, 1977, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V33, P981, DOI 10.1002/1097-4679(197710)33:4<981::AID-JCLP2270330412>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-0