NPV-based decision support in multi-objective design using evolutionary algorithms

被引:8
作者
Vucina, Damir [1 ]
Lozina, Zeljan [1 ]
Vlak, Frane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Split, FESB, Fac Elect Engn Mech Engn & Naval Architecture, Split 21000, Croatia
关键词
Decision support; Multi-objective; Design optimization; Net Present Value; Multi-layer sandwich plates; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.engappai.2009.09.007
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Optimum design problems are frequently formulated using a single excellence criterion (minimum mass or similar) with evolutionary algorithms engaged as decision-support tools. Alternatively, multi-objective formulations are used with a posteriori decision-making amongst the Pareto candidate solutions. The former typically introduces excessive simplification in the decision space and subjectivity, the latter leads to extensive numerical effort and postpones the compromise decision-making. In both cases, engineering excellence metrics such as minimum mass can be misleading in terms of performance of the respective design in the given operational environment. This paper presents an alternative approach to conceptual design where a compound objective function based on the Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) aggregate performance metrics is developed. This formulation models the integral value delivered by the candidate designs over their respective life-cycles by applying value-based NPV discounting to all objectives. It can be incorporated as an a priori compromise and consequently viewed as a weighted sum of individual objectives corresponding to their economically faithful representation over the entire operational life-time of the designs. The multi-objective design optimization is consequently expanded from purely engineering terms to coupled engineering-financial decision support. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 60
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999 C EV COMP WASH
[2]  
Behrens W., 1991, Manual for the Preparation of Industrial Feasibility Studies
[3]  
Bendekovic J, 1993, PLANING INVESTMENT P
[4]  
BEZUHOV NI, 1973, STABILNOST DINAMIKA
[5]  
Eliasson J, 2000, MAXIMIZATION PROFIT
[6]   The topological design of multifunctional cellular metals [J].
Evans, AG ;
Hutchinson, JW ;
Fleck, NA ;
Ashby, MF ;
Wadley, HNG .
PROGRESS IN MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2001, 46 (3-4) :309-327
[7]  
GEORGIOPOULOS P, 2002, P DETC 02 DEC ENG TE
[8]   Decision-based collaborative optimization [J].
Gu, XY ;
Renaud, JE ;
Ashe, LM ;
Batill, SM ;
Budhiraja, AS ;
Krajewski, LJ .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2002, 124 (01) :1-13
[9]  
Hallerbach W., 2002, J MULTICRITERIA DECI, V11, P111, DOI [10.1002/mcda.324, DOI 10.1002/MCDA.324]
[10]  
HARRIS JC, 2002, ASME, V120, P653