mHealth Physical Activity Intervention: A Randomized Pilot Study in Physically Inactive Pregnant Women

被引:123
作者
Choi, JiWon [1 ]
Lee, Ji Hyeon [2 ]
Vittinghoff, Eric [3 ]
Fukuoka, Yoshimi [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Inst Hlth & Aging, 3333 Calif St,Suite 340, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Teachers Coll, Dept Biobehav Sci, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth & Aging, Dept Physiol Nursing, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Physical activity; Pregnancy; Mobile health; SELF-EFFICACY; PRIMARY-CARE; EXERCISE; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10995-015-1895-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Physical inactivity is prevalent in pregnant women, and innovative strategies to promote physical activity are strongly needed. The purpose of the study was to test a 12-week mobile health (mHealth) physical activity intervention for feasibility and potential efficacy. Methods Participants were recruited between December 2012 and February 2014 using diverse recruitment methods. Thirty pregnant women between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation were randomized to an intervention (mobile phone app plus Fitbit) or a control (Fitbit) group. Both conditions targeted gradual increases in physical activity. The mHealth intervention included daily messages and a mobile phone activity diary with automated feedback and self-monitoring systems. Results On monthly average, 4 women were screened for initial eligibility by telephone and 2.5 were randomized. Intervention participants had a 1096 +/- A 1898 step increase in daily steps compared to an increase of 259 +/- A 1604 steps in control participants at 12 weeks. The change between groups in weekly mean steps per day during the 12-week study period was not statistically significant (p = 0.38). The intervention group reported lower perceived barrier to being active, lack of energy, than the control group at 12-week visit (p = 0.02). The rates of responding to daily messages and using the daily diary through the mobile app declined during the 12 week study period. Discussion It was difficult to recruit and randomize inactive women who wanted to increase physical activity during pregnancy. Pregnant women who were motivated to increase physical activity might find using mobile technologies in assessing and promoting PA acceptable. Possible reasons for the non-significant treatment effect of the mHealth intervention on physical activity are discussed. Public awareness of safety and benefits of physical activity during pregnancy should be promoted.
引用
收藏
页码:1091 / 1101
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ACOG, 2002, OBSTET GYNECOL, V99, P869
[2]  
ACOG Committee Obstetric Practice, 2002, Obstet Gynecol, V99, P171
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, WEIGHT GAIN PREGN RE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008
[5]   TESTS OF THE GENERALITY OF SELF-EFFICACY THEORY [J].
BANDURA, A ;
ADAMS, NE ;
HARDY, AB ;
HOWELLS, GN .
COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1980, 4 (01) :39-66
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), BARR BEING ACT
[7]   Process and Treatment of Pedometer Data Collection for Youth: The Canadian Physical Activity Levels among Youth Study [J].
Craig, Cora Lynn ;
Tudor-Locke, Catrine ;
Cragg, Sue ;
Cameron, Christine .
MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2010, 42 (03) :430-435
[8]   Joint SOGC/CSEP Clinical Practice Guideline: Exercise in pregnancy and the postpartum period [J].
Davies, GAL ;
Wolfe, LA ;
Mottola, MF ;
MacKinnon, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PHYSIOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 2003, 28 (03) :329-341
[9]   Women's exercise beliefs and behaviors during their pregnancy and postpartum [J].
Downs, DS ;
Hausenblas, HA .
JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2004, 49 (02) :138-144
[10]   Perceived Barriers to Physical Activity Among Pregnant Women [J].
Evenson, Kelly R. ;
Moos, Merry-K. ;
Carrier, Kathryn ;
Siega-Riz, Anna Maria .
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH JOURNAL, 2009, 13 (03) :364-375