Generative Deep Neural Networks for Inverse Materials Design Using Backpropagation and Active Learning

被引:241
作者
Chen, Chun-Teh [1 ]
Gu, Grace X. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Mech Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
composites; inverse problem; machine learning; materials design; optimization algorithms; MACHINE; OPTIMIZATION; INFORMATICS; MODELS; GENE;
D O I
10.1002/advs.201902607
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
In recent years, machine learning (ML) techniques are seen to be promising tools to discover and design novel materials. However, the lack of robust inverse design approaches to identify promising candidate materials without exploring the entire design space causes a fundamental bottleneck. A general-purpose inverse design approach is presented using generative inverse design networks. This ML-based inverse design approach uses backpropagation to calculate the analytical gradients of an objective function with respect to design variables. This inverse design approach is capable of overcoming local minima traps by using backpropagation to provide rapid calculations of gradient information and running millions of optimizations with different initial values. Furthermore, an active learning strategy is adopted in the inverse design approach to improve the performance of candidate materials and reduce the amount of training data needed to do so. Compared to passive learning, the active learning strategy is capable of generating better designs and reducing the amount of training data by at least an order-of-magnitude in the case study on composite materials. The inverse design approach is compared with conventional gradient-based topology optimization and gradient-free genetic algorithms and the pros and cons of each method are discussed when applied to materials discovery and design problems.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Giga-voxel computational morphogenesis for structural design [J].
Aage, Niels ;
Andreassen, Erik ;
Lazarov, Boyan S. ;
Sigmund, Ole .
NATURE, 2017, 550 (7674) :84-+
[2]  
Abadi Martin, 2016, arXiv
[3]  
Bendsoe M.P., 1995, Optimization of structural topology, shape, and material, V414
[4]   Machine learning for molecular and materials science [J].
Butler, Keith T. ;
Davies, Daniel W. ;
Cartwright, Hugh ;
Isayev, Olexandr ;
Walsh, Aron .
NATURE, 2018, 559 (7715) :547-555
[5]   Machine learning for composite materials [J].
Chen, Chun-Teh ;
Gu, Grace X. .
MRS COMMUNICATIONS, 2019, 9 (02) :556-566
[6]   Effect of Constituent Materials on Composite Performance: Exploring Design Strategies via Machine Learning [J].
Chen, Chun-Teh ;
Gu, Grace X. .
ADVANCED THEORY AND SIMULATIONS, 2019, 2 (06)
[7]   Crystal structure representations for machine learning models of formation energies [J].
Faber, Felix ;
Lindmaa, Alexander ;
von Lilienfeld, O. Anatole ;
Armiento, Rickard .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 2015, 115 (16) :1094-1101
[8]   An introduction to the adjoint approach to design [J].
Giles, MB ;
Pierce, NA .
FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 2000, 65 (3-4) :393-415
[9]   Generative Adversarial Networks [J].
Goodfellow, Ian ;
Pouget-Abadie, Jean ;
Mirza, Mehdi ;
Xu, Bing ;
Warde-Farley, David ;
Ozair, Sherjil ;
Courville, Aaron ;
Bengio, Yoshua .
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2020, 63 (11) :139-144
[10]   Bioinspired hierarchical composite design using machine learning: simulation, additive manufacturing, and experiment [J].
Gu, Grace X. ;
Chen, Chun-Teh ;
Richmond, Deon J. ;
Buehler, Markus J. .
MATERIALS HORIZONS, 2018, 5 (05) :939-945