Randomized evaluation of live attenuated vs. inactivated influenza vaccines in schools (RELATIVES) pilot study: A cluster randomized trial

被引:17
|
作者
Kwong, Jeffrey C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Pereira, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Quach, Susan [1 ]
Pellizzari, Rosana [6 ]
Dusome, Edwina [6 ]
Russell, Margaret L. [7 ]
Hamid, Jemila S. [8 ,9 ]
Feinberg, Yael [1 ]
Winter, Anne-Luise [1 ]
Gubbay, Jonathan B. [1 ,10 ,11 ]
Sirtonski, Brittany [1 ]
Moher, Deanna [1 ]
Sider, Doug [1 ]
Finkelstein, Michael [2 ,12 ]
Loeb, Mark [13 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Dept Family & Community Med, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[5] Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Peterborough Cty City Hlth Unit, Peterborough, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Calgary, Cumming Sch Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[8] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[9] St Michaels Hosp, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Inst, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[10] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[11] Univ Toronto, Dept Paediat, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[12] Toronto Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[13] McMaster Univ, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Influenza; Parents*; Immunization Programs*; Schools; Canada; Ontario; VACCINATION; CHILDREN; IMPACT; IMMUNIZATION; ATTITUDES; ONTARIO; PROGRAM; RATES;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.11.044
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: School-based influenza immunization can effectively address accessibility barriers, but injected inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV) may not be acceptable to some children and parents in school settings. Objectives: To better understand the feasibility of offering intranasal live attenuated influenza vaccines (LAIV) through schools, we assessed uptake, stakeholder acceptability, and cost of school-based delivery of LAIV compared to IIV. Methods: We piloted an open-label cluster randomized trial involving 10 elementary schools in Peterborough, Ontario during the 2013-2014 influenza vaccination campaign. Schools were randomized to having students receive IIV or LAIV at publicly-funded school-based clinics organized by the local public health department. We measured the percentage of students vaccinated with at least one dose of influenza vaccine at school. Stakeholder acceptability was evaluated through a questionnaire of parents and interviews of public health department personnel and school principals. We compared the costs per dose of vaccine administered, including staff time and costs of vaccines and supplies. Results: Single-dose influenza vaccine uptake was higher for the five schools offering LAIV than for the five offering IIV (19.3% vs. 12.2%, p = 0.02). Interviews with nine school principals and five public health department personnel suggested that the clinics ran smoothly with little disruption to school routines, and that LAIV was associated with increased efficiency and calmer children. All interviewees cited unfamiliarity with LAIV and the study recruitment package length as potential reasons for low uptake. The cost per vaccine dose administered was $38.67 for IIV and $43.50 for LAIV. Conclusions: Use of LAIV in school-based clinics was associated with increased vaccine uptake and the perception among immunizing staff of reduced child anxiety, but also slightly higher vaccine administration costs, compared to IIV. However, uptake was low for both groups. More effective strategies to promote influenza vaccines and to obtain parent consent may improve vaccine uptake. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 541
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized evaluation of live attenuated vs. inactivated influenza vaccines in schools (RELATIVES) cluster randomized trial: Pilot results from a household surveillance study to assess direct and indirect protection from influenza vaccination
    Kwong, Jeffrey C.
    Pereira, Jennifer A.
    Quach, Susan
    Pellizzari, Rosana
    Dusome, Edwina
    Russell, Margaret L.
    Hamid, Jemila S.
    Feinberg, Yael
    Winter, Anne-Luise
    Gubbay, Jonathan B.
    Sirtonski, Brittany
    Moher, Deanna
    Sider, Doug
    Finkelstein, Michael
    Loeb, Mark
    VACCINE, 2015, 33 (38) : 4910 - 4915
  • [2] Immunogenicity of seasonal inactivated influenza and inactivated polio vaccines among children in Senegal: Results from a cluster-randomized trial
    Niang, Mbayame
    Deming, Meagan E.
    Goudiaby, Deborah
    Diop, Ousmane M.
    Dia, Ndongo
    Diallo, Aldiouma
    Ortiz, Justin R.
    Diop, Doudou
    Lewis, Kristen D. C.
    Lafond, Kathryn E.
    Widdowson, Marc-Alain
    Victor, John C.
    Neuzil, Kathleen M.
    VACCINE, 2020, 38 (47) : 7526 - 7532
  • [3] A prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing the safety and efficacy of trivalent live attenuated and inactivated influenza vaccines in adults 60 years of age and older
    Forrest, Bruce D.
    Steele, A. Duncan
    Hiemstra, Louis
    Rappaport, Ruth
    Ambrose, Christopher S.
    Gruber, William C.
    VACCINE, 2011, 29 (20) : 3633 - 3639
  • [4] Comparison of the trivalent live attenuated vs. inactivated influenza vaccines among US military service members
    Eick, Angelia A.
    Wang, Zhong
    Hughes, Hayley
    Ford, Stephen M.
    Tobler, Steven K.
    VACCINE, 2009, 27 (27) : 3568 - 3575
  • [5] Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of high- vs. standard-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in healthcare workers: a pilot randomized controlled trial
    Volling, C.
    Coleman, B. L.
    Katz, K.
    Simor, A. E.
    Muller, M.
    Powis, J.
    McElhaney, J.
    McGeer, A.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2019, 25 (02) : 217 - 224
  • [6] Safety of Simultaneous vs Sequential mRNA COVID-19 and Inactivated Influenza Vaccines: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Walter, Emmanuel B.
    Schlaudecker, Elizabeth P.
    Talaat, Kawsar R.
    Rountree, Wes
    Broder, Karen R.
    Duffy, Jonathan
    Grohskopf, Lisa A.
    Poniewierski, Marek S.
    Spreng, Rachel L.
    Staat, Mary A.
    Tekalign, Rediet
    Museru, Oidda
    Goel, Anju
    Davis, Grace N.
    Schmader, Kenneth E.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2024, 7 (11) : e2443166
  • [7] A Randomized Trial to Increase Acceptance of Childhood Vaccines by Vaccine-Hesitant Parents: A Pilot Study
    Williams, S. Elizabeth
    Rothman, Russell L.
    Offit, Paul A.
    Schaffner, William
    Sullivan, Molly
    Edwards, Kathryn M.
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2013, 13 (05) : 475 - 480
  • [8] A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Immunogenicity to Cell-Based Versus Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccines in Children
    Williams, Katherine, V
    Li, Zhu-Nan
    Zhai, Bo
    Alcorn, John F.
    Nowalk, Mary Patricia
    Levine, Min Z.
    Kim, Sara S.
    Flannery, Brendan
    Geffel, Krissy Moehling
    Merranko, Amanda Jaber
    Collins, Mark
    Susick, Michael
    Clarke, Karen S.
    Zimmerman, Richard K.
    Martin, Judith M.
    JOURNAL OF THE PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES SOCIETY, 2023, 12 (06) : 342 - 352
  • [9] A randomized controlled trial of antibody response to 2019-20 cell-based inactivated and egg-based live attenuated influenza vaccines in children and young adults
    Williams, Katherine, V
    Zhai, Bo
    Alcorn, John F.
    Nowalk, Mary Patricia
    Levine, Min Z.
    Kim, Sara S.
    Flannery, Brendan
    Geffel, Krissy Moehling
    Merranko, Amanda Jaber
    Nagg, Jennifer P.
    Collins, Mark
    Susick, Michael
    Clarke, Karen S.
    Zimmerman, Richard K.
    Martin, Judith M.
    VACCINE, 2022, 40 (05) : 780 - 788
  • [10] Safety and immunogenicity of influenza whole inactivated virus vaccines: A phase I randomized clinical trial
    van Boxtel, Renee A. J.
    Verdijk, Pauline
    de Boer, Otto J.
    van Riet, Elly
    Mensinga, Tjeert T.
    Luytjes, Willem
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2015, 11 (04) : 983 - 990