Comparative efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine, pregabalin, and milnacipran for the treatment of fibromyalgia: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:30
作者
Lee, Young Ho [1 ]
Song, Gwan Gyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Anam Hosp, Coll Med, Div Rheumatol,Dept Internal Med, 73 Inchon Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
关键词
Duloxetine; Pregabalin; Milnacipran; Fibromyalgia; MODIFYING ANTIRHEUMATIC DRUGS; PHASE-III TRIAL; DOUBLE-BLIND; RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS; MONOTHERAPY; INCONSISTENCY; INTERVENTIONS; MULTICENTER; TOXICITY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s00296-016-3468-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to assess the relative efficacy and tolerability of duloxetine, pregabalin, and milnacipran at the recommended doses in patients with fibromyalgia. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg, pregabalin 300 mg, pregabalin 150 mg, milnacipran 200 mg, and milnacipran 100 mg compared to placebo in patients with fibromyalgia were included in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. Nine RCTs including 5140 patients met the inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients with > 30 % improvement from baseline in pain was significantly higher in the duloxetine 60 mg, pregabalin 300 mg, milnacipran 100 mg, and milnacipran 200 mg groups than in the placebo group [pairwise odds ratio (OR) 2.33, 95 % credible interval (CrI) 1.50-3.67; OR 1.68, 95 % CrI 1.25-2.28; OR 1.62, 95 % CrI 1.16-2.25; and OR 1.61; 95 % CrI 1.15-2.24, respectively]. Ranking probability based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) indicated that duloxetine 60 mg had the highest probability of being the best treatment for achieving the response level (SUCRA = 0.9431), followed by pregabalin 300 mg (SUCRA = 0.6300), milnacipran 100 mg (SUCRA = 0.5680), milnacipran 200 mg (SUCRA = 0.5617), pregabalin 150 mg (SUCRA = 0.2392), and placebo (SUCRA = 0.0580). The risk of withdrawal due to adverse events was lower in the placebo group than in the pregabalin 300 mg, duloxetine 60 mg, milnacipran 100 mg, and milnacipran 200 mg groups. However, there was no significant difference in the efficacy and tolerability between the medications at the recommended doses. Duloxetine 60 mg, pregabalin 300 mg, milnacipran 100 mg, and milnacipran 200 mg were more efficacious than placebo. However, there was no significant difference in the efficacy and tolerability between the medications at the recommended doses.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 672
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]   A 14-week, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled monotherapy trial of pregabalin in patients with fibromyalgia [J].
Arnold, Lesley M. ;
Russell, I. Jon ;
Diri, E. W. ;
Duan, W. Rachel ;
Young, James P., Jr. ;
Sharma, Uma ;
Martin, Susan A. ;
Barrett, Jeannette A. ;
Haig, George .
JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2008, 9 (09) :792-805
[3]   Efficacy and Safety of Milnacipran 100 mg/day in Patients With Fibromyalgia [J].
Arnold, Lesley M. ;
Gendreau, R. Michael ;
Palmer, Robert H. ;
Gendreau, Judy F. ;
Wang, Yong .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2010, 62 (09) :2745-2756
[4]   A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of duloxetine in the treatment of women with fibromyalgia with or without major depressive disorder [J].
Arnold, LM ;
Rosen, A ;
Pritchett, YL ;
D'Souza, DN ;
Goldstein, DJ ;
Iyengar, S ;
Wernicke, JF .
PAIN, 2005, 119 (1-3) :5-15
[5]   A European Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Monotherapy Clinical Trial of Milnacipran in Treatment of Fibromyalgia [J].
Branco, Jaime C. ;
Zachrisson, Olof ;
Perrot, Serge ;
Mainguy, Yves .
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 37 (04) :851-859
[6]   A microsoft-excel-based tool for running and critically appraising network meta-analyses-an overview and application of NetMetaXL [J].
Brown S. ;
Hutton B. ;
Clifford T. ;
Coyle D. ;
Grima D. ;
Wells G. ;
Cameron C. .
Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
[7]   An update on pharmacotherapy for the treatment of fibromyalgia [J].
Calandre, Elena P. ;
Rico-Villademoros, Fernando ;
Slim, Mahmoud .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2015, 16 (09) :1347-1368
[8]   Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence [J].
Caldwell, DM ;
Ades, AE ;
Higgins, JPT .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 331 (7521) :897-900
[9]   Network meta-analysis for comparing treatment effects of multiple interventions: an introduction [J].
Catala-Lopez, Ferran ;
Tobias, Aurelio ;
Cameron, Chris ;
Moher, David ;
Hutton, Brian .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (11) :1489-1496
[10]   A meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient withdrawal [J].
Choy, EHS ;
Smith, C ;
Doré, CJ ;
Scott, DL .
RHEUMATOLOGY, 2005, 44 (11) :1414-1421