Using nitrogen-15 to quantify vegetative buffer effectiveness for sequestering nitrogen in runoff

被引:37
作者
Bedard-Haughn, A [1 ]
Tate, KW [1 ]
van Kessel, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agron & Range Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2004.2252
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Previous studies have observed higher levels of soluble nutrients leaving vegetative buffers than entering them, suggesting that the buffers themselves are acting as a source rather than a sink by releasing previously stored nutrients. This study used 98 atom % N-15-labeled KNO3 at a rate of 5 kg ha(-1) to quantify buffer efficiency for sequestering new inputs of NO3--N in an extensively grazed irrigated pasture system. Buffer treatments consisted of an 8-m buffer, a 16-m buffer, and a nonbuffered control. Regardless of the form of runoff N (NO3-, NH4+, or dissolved organic nitrogen [DON]), more N-15 was lost from the nonbuffered treatments than from the buffered treatments. The majority of the N attenuation was by vegetative uptake. Over the course of the study, the 8-m buffer decreased NO3--N-15 load by 28% and the 16-m buffer decreased load by 42%. For NH4+-N-15, the decrease was 34 and 48%, and for DON-N-15, the decrease was 21 and 9%. Although the buffers were effective overall, the majority of the buffer impact occurred in the first four weeks after N-15 application, with the buffered plots attenuating nearly twice as much N-15 as the nonbuffered plots. For the remainder of the study, buffer effect was not as marked; there was a steady release of N-15, particularly NO3-- and DON-N-15, from the buffers into the runoff. This suggests that for buffers to be sustainable for N sequestration there is a need to manage buffer vegetation to maximize N demand and retention.
引用
收藏
页码:2252 / 2262
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[11]   NITRATE DETERMINATION BY REDUCTION TO AMMONIA AND GAS-PHASE UV ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY [J].
CRESSER, MS .
ANALYST, 1977, 102 (1211) :99-103
[12]  
CRUMPTON WG, 1987, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V59, P905
[13]  
DAVIDSON EA, 1990, ECOLOGY, V71, P1968, DOI 10.2307/1937605
[14]   Seasonal groundwater nitrate dynamics in a riparian buffer zone [J].
Dhondt, K ;
Boeckx, P ;
van Cleemput, O ;
Hofman, G ;
de Troch, F .
AGRONOMIE, 2002, 22 (7-8) :747-753
[15]   Contributions to nitrogen leaching and pasture uptake by autumn-applied dairy effluent and ammonium fertilizer labeled with 15N isotope [J].
Di, HJ ;
Cameron, KC ;
Moore, S ;
Smith, NP .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1999, 210 (02) :189-198
[16]  
DILLAHA TA, 1989, T ASAE, V32, P513, DOI 10.13031/2013.31033
[17]   Setting priorities for research on pollution reduction functions of agricultural buffers [J].
Dosskey, MG .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2002, 30 (05) :641-650
[18]   Toward quantifying water pollution abatement in response to installing buffers on crop land [J].
Dosskey, MG .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2001, 28 (05) :577-598
[19]  
Griffith SM, 1997, SOIL SCI PLANT NUTR, V43, P1025
[20]   Nitrous oxide production in riparian zones and groundwater [J].
Groffman, PM ;
Gold, AJ ;
Jacinthe, PA .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 1998, 52 (2-3) :179-186