Previous studies have observed higher levels of soluble nutrients leaving vegetative buffers than entering them, suggesting that the buffers themselves are acting as a source rather than a sink by releasing previously stored nutrients. This study used 98 atom % N-15-labeled KNO3 at a rate of 5 kg ha(-1) to quantify buffer efficiency for sequestering new inputs of NO3--N in an extensively grazed irrigated pasture system. Buffer treatments consisted of an 8-m buffer, a 16-m buffer, and a nonbuffered control. Regardless of the form of runoff N (NO3-, NH4+, or dissolved organic nitrogen [DON]), more N-15 was lost from the nonbuffered treatments than from the buffered treatments. The majority of the N attenuation was by vegetative uptake. Over the course of the study, the 8-m buffer decreased NO3--N-15 load by 28% and the 16-m buffer decreased load by 42%. For NH4+-N-15, the decrease was 34 and 48%, and for DON-N-15, the decrease was 21 and 9%. Although the buffers were effective overall, the majority of the buffer impact occurred in the first four weeks after N-15 application, with the buffered plots attenuating nearly twice as much N-15 as the nonbuffered plots. For the remainder of the study, buffer effect was not as marked; there was a steady release of N-15, particularly NO3-- and DON-N-15, from the buffers into the runoff. This suggests that for buffers to be sustainable for N sequestration there is a need to manage buffer vegetation to maximize N demand and retention.