On steady-state disturbance compensability for actuator placement in adaptive structures

被引:39
|
作者
Wagner, Julia Laura [1 ]
Gade, Jan [2 ]
Heidingsfeld, Michael [1 ]
Geiger, Florian [2 ]
von Scheven, Malte [2 ]
Boehm, Michael [1 ]
Bischoff, Manfred [2 ]
Sawodny, Oliver [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Syst Dynam, Waldburgstr 19, D-70563 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Struct Mech, Pfaffenwaldring 7, D-70563 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
adaptive structures; actuator placement; steady-state disturbance compensability; redundancy; statical indeterminacy; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1515/auto-2017-0099
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Adaptive structures in civil engineering are mechanical structures with the ability to modify their response to external loads. Actuators strongly affect a structure's adaptivity and have to be placed thoughtfully in the design process to effectively compensate external loads. For constant loads, this property is introduced as steady-state disturbance compensability. This property can be linked to concepts from structural engineering such as redundancy or statical indeterminacy, thus representing an interdisciplinary approach. Based on the disturbance compensability matrix, a scalar performance metric is derived as quantitative measure of a structure's ability to compensate the output error for arbitrary constant disturbances with a given set of actuators. By minimizing this metric, an actuator configuration is determined. The concept is applied to an example of a truss structure.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 603
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global optimal actuator placement for adaptive structures: New formulation and benchmarking
    Senatore, Gennaro
    Virgili, Francesco
    Blandini, Lucio
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MATERIAL SYSTEMS AND STRUCTURES, 2025, 36 (03) : 151 - 173
  • [2] Motion Design with Efficient Actuator Placement for Adaptive Structures that Perform Large Deformations
    Sachse, Renate
    Geiger, Florian
    von Scheven, Malte
    Bischoff, Manfred
    FRONTIERS IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 7
  • [3] Optimal Steady-State Regulation by State Feedback
    Hafez, Mohamed A.
    Uzeda, Erick Mejia
    Broucke, Mireille E.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2024, 69 (09) : 6042 - 6057
  • [4] Actuator placement based on reachable set optimization for expected disturbance
    Redmond, J
    Parker, G
    JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1996, 90 (02) : 279 - 300
  • [5] Adaptive Batteries Exploiting On-Line Steady-State Evolution Strategy
    Fadda, Edoardo
    Perboli, Guido
    Squillero, Giovanni
    APPLICATIONS OF EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, EVOAPPLICATIONS 2017, PT I, 2017, 10199 : 329 - 341
  • [6] Inverse solution technique of steady-state responses for local nonlinear structures
    Wang, Xing
    Guan, Xin
    Zheng, Gangtie
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2016, 70-71 : 1085 - 1096
  • [7] Steady-state to steady-state transfer of PDEs using semi-discretization and flatness
    Chatterjee, Soham
    Natarajan, Vivek
    2020 59TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2020, : 4454 - 4459
  • [8] Optimal Steady-State Disturbance Compensation for Constrained Linear Systems: The Gaussian Noise Case
    Falsone, Alessandro
    Deori, Luca
    Ioli, Daniele
    Garatti, Simone
    Prandini, Maria
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2022, 67 (12) : 6322 - 6332
  • [9] On the existence and uniqueness of steady state solutions of a class of dynamic hydraulic networks via actuator placement
    Jeeninga, Mark
    Machado, Juan E.
    Cucuzzella, Michele
    Como, Giacomo
    Scherpen, Jacquelien
    2023 62ND IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, CDC, 2023, : 3652 - 3657
  • [10] Optimal actuator placement in adaptive optics systems
    Altiner, Berk
    Erol, Bilal
    Delibasi, Akin
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2022, 28 (21-22) : 3397 - 3410