Switching and Growth for Microbial Populations in Catastrophic Responsive Environments

被引:65
作者
Visco, Paolo [1 ]
Allen, Rosalind J. [1 ]
Majumdar, Satya N. [2 ]
Evans, Martin R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, SUPA, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Paris Sud, Lab Phys Theor & Modeles Stat, UMR 8626, CNRS, Orsay, France
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
BACTERIAL PERSISTENCE; GENE-EXPRESSION; PHASE; SURVIVAL; ADAPTATION; DIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.bpj.2009.11.049
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Phase variation, or stochastic switching between alternative states of gene expression, is common among microbes, and may be important in coping with changing environments. We use a theoretical model to assess whether such switching is a good strategy for growth in environments with occasional catastrophic events. We find that switching can be advantageous, but only when the environment is responsive to the microbial population. In our model, microbes switch randomly between two phenotypic states, with different growth rates. The environment undergoes sudden catastrophes, the probability of which depends on the composition of the population. We derive a simple analytical result for the population growth rate. For a responsive environment, two alternative strategies emerge. In the no-switching strategy, the population maximizes its instantaneous growth rate, regardless of catastrophes. In the switching strategy, the microbial switching rate is tuned to minimize the environmental response. Which of these strategies is most favorable depends on the parameters of the model. Previous studies have shown that microbial switching can be favorable when the environment changes in an unresponsive fashion between several states. Here, we demonstrate an alternative role for phase variation in allowing microbes to maximize their growth in catastrophic responsive environments.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1108
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Stochastic switching as a survival strategy in fluctuating environments [J].
Acar, Murat ;
Mettetal, Jerome T. ;
van Oudenaarden, Alexander .
NATURE GENETICS, 2008, 40 (04) :471-475
[2]   Self-destructive cooperation mediated by phenotypic noise [J].
Ackermann, Martin ;
Stecher, Baerbel ;
Freed, Nikki E. ;
Songhet, Pascal ;
Hardt, Wolf-Dietrich ;
Doebeli, Michael .
NATURE, 2008, 454 (7207) :987-990
[3]  
[Anonymous], OXFORD SURVEYS EVOLU
[4]   Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch [J].
Balaban, NQ ;
Merrin, J ;
Chait, R ;
Kowalik, L ;
Leibler, S .
SCIENCE, 2004, 305 (5690) :1622-1625
[5]   Investigating autocatalytic gene expression systems through mechanistic modeling [J].
Carrier, TA ;
Keasling, JD .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 201 (01) :25-36
[6]  
DAVIS MHA, 1984, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V46, P353
[7]   Bacterial physiology, regulation and mutational adaptation in a chemostat environment [J].
Ferenci, Thomas .
ADVANCES IN MICROBIAL PHYSIOLOGY, VOL 53, 2008, 53 :169-+
[8]   Stochastic gene expression in switching environments [J].
Gander, Martin J. ;
Mazza, Christian ;
Rummler, Hansklaus .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 55 (02) :249-269
[9]   Playing Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: combined mechanisms of phase variation in bacteria [J].
Hallet, B .
CURRENT OPINION IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 4 (05) :570-581
[10]   Molecular switches - the ON and OFF of bacterial phase variation [J].
Henderson, IR ;
Owen, P ;
Nataro, JP .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 1999, 33 (05) :919-932