Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program

被引:203
作者
Palencia, Laia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Espelt, Albert [1 ,2 ]
Rodriguez-Sanz, Maica [1 ,2 ]
Puigpinos, Rosa [1 ,2 ]
Pons-Vigues, Mariona [1 ,2 ]
Isabel Pasarin, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Spadea, Teresa [4 ]
Kunst, Anton E. [5 ]
Borrell, Carme [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Agencia Salut Publ Barcelona, Barcelona 08023, Spain
[2] CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
[3] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Dept Expt & Hlth Sci, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Reg Epidemiol Unit, Grugliasco, Italy
[5] Univ Amsterdam, AMC, Dept Publ Hlth, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Socio-economic factors; mass screening; breast neoplasm; uterine cervical neoplasm; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1093/ije/dyq003
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Methods A cross-sectional study was performed using individual-level data from the WHO World Health Survey (2002) and data regarding the implementation of cancer screening programmes. The study population consisted of women from 22 European countries, aged 25-69 years for cervical cancer screening (n =11 770) and 50-69 years for breast cancer screening (n = 4784). Dependent variables were having had a PAP smear and having had a mammography during the previous 3 years. The main independent variables were socio-economic position (SEP) and the type of screening program in the country. For each country the prevalence of screening was calculated, overall and for each level of education, and indices of relative (RII) and absolute (SII) inequality were computed by educational level. Multilevel logistic regression models were fitted. Results SEP inequalities in screening were found in countries with opportunistic screening [comparing highest with lowest educational level: RII = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.48 for cervical cancer; and RII = 3.11, 95% CI 1.78-5.42 for breast cancer] but not in countries with nationwide population-based programmes. Inequalities were also observed in countries with regional screening programs (RII = 1.35, 95% CI 1.10-1.65 for cervical cancer; and RII = 1.58, 95% CI 1.26-1.98 for breast cancer). Conclusions Inequalities in the use of cancer screening according to SEP are higher in countries without population-based cancer screening programmes. These results highlight the potential benefits of population-based screening programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 765
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Advisory Comm Canc Prevention, 2000, EUR J CANCER, V36, P1473
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1968, Public Health Papers (WHO)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Global cancer facts and figures 2007
[4]   Social inequality in Pap smear coverage: identifying under-users of cervical cancer screening in Argentina [J].
Arrossi, Silvina ;
Ramos, Silvina ;
Paolino, Melisa ;
Sankaranarayanan, Rengaswamy .
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH MATTERS, 2008, 16 (32) :50-58
[5]  
Bonfill X., 2001, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, V1, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD002943, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD002943]
[6]   Are breast cancer screening practices associated with sociodemographic status and healthcare access? Analysis of a French cross-sectional study [J].
Duport, Nicolas ;
Ancelle-Park, Rosemary ;
Boussac-Zarebska, Marjorie ;
Uhry, Zoe ;
Bloch, Juliette .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2008, 17 (03) :218-224
[7]   Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening [J].
Everett, Thomas ;
Bryant, Andrew ;
Griffin, Michelle F. ;
Martin-Hirsch, Pierre P. L. ;
Forbes, Carol A. ;
Jepson, Ruth G. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (05)
[8]   Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006 [J].
Ferlay, J. ;
Autier, P. ;
Boniol, M. ;
Heanue, M. ;
Colombet, M. ;
Boyle, P. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2007, 18 (03) :581-592
[9]   Cancer screening: Evidence and practice in Europe 2008 [J].
Hakama, Matti ;
Coleman, Michel P. ;
Alexe, Delia-Marina ;
Auvinen, Anssi .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 44 (10) :1404-1413
[10]  
Jargin SV, 2008, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V199, pE10, DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.03.017