Optimizing Vancomycin Monitoring in Pediatric Patients

被引:19
|
作者
Alsultan, Abdullah [1 ,2 ]
Abouelkheir, Manal [3 ]
Alqahtani, Saeed [1 ,2 ]
Aljabri, Ahmad [3 ]
Somily, Ali M. [4 ]
Alsubaie, Sarah [5 ]
Alrabiaah, Abdulkarim [5 ]
Bukhari, Elham [5 ]
Alzamil, Fahad [5 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ Med City, Dept Clin Pharm, Coll Pharm, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ Med City, Clin Pharmacokinet & Pharmacodynam Unit, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Saud Univ Med City, Pediat Clin Pharm Serv, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Saud Univ Med City, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Saud Univ, Pediat Infect Dis Unit, Dept Pediat, Coll Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
vancomycin; pediatrics; therapeutic drug monitoring; pharmacokinetics; Monte Carlo simulation; UNDER-THE-CURVE; INDUCED NEPHROTOXICITY; TROUGH CONCENTRATIONS; CHILDREN; AREA; INFECTIONS; PHARMACODYNAMICS; ASSOCIATION; EFFICACY; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.1097/INF.0000000000001943
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Several studies have reported that trough levels may not be optimal for monitoring vancomycin therapy, because of overexposure and nephrotoxicity risks. Therefore, we developed a population pharmacokinetic model to optimize vancomycin dosing and monitoring in pediatrics. Methods: Data were retrospectively collected on 76 pediatric patients 1-12 years of age, admitted to general pediatric wards or intensive care units at King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The predictability of 3 methods for calculating the area under the curve (AUC) at steady state was assessed for optimum vancomycin therapy monitoring. The 3 methods were simple linear regression, Bayesian approach and the 2-sample pharmacokinetic equation method. We also used Monet Carlo simulations to evaluate the dosing of vancomycin. Results: A 1-compartment model adequately described the data. A strong correlation occurred between the observed and predicted AUC from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24h)) calculated using the Bayesian approach with a trough sample only or pharmacokinetic equations based on 2 measured samples (R-2 = 0.93 and 0.92, respectively). For the simple linear regression method with a trough sample only, the predicted AUC(0-24h) at steady state with vancomycin trough levels of 10, 15 and 20 mu g/mL were 413, 548 and 714 mu g<bold>hour</bold>/mL, respectively. The target AUC(0-24h) above 400 was achieved in 46% and 95% of individuals with trough values of 7-11 and 11-15 mu g/mL, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations showed that 60-80mg/kg/d doses are needed to optimize vancomycin therapy. Conclusions: In conclusion, targeting vancomycin trough levels above 15 mu g/mL in pediatrics would overshoot the target AUC(0-24h) above 400 and expose them to unnecessary adverse events.
引用
收藏
页码:880 / 885
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Model-based Evaluation of the Clinical and Microbiological Efficacy of Vancomycin: A Prospective Study of Chinese Adult In-house Patients
    Shen, Kai
    Yang, Minjie
    Fan, Yaxin
    Liang, Xiaoyu
    Chen, Yuancheng
    Wu, Jufang
    Yu, Jicheng
    Zhang, Huifang
    Wang, Ruilan
    Zhang, Fengying
    Hang, Jingqing
    Wen, Xiaoxing
    Li, Huayin
    Shen, Lihua
    Zhang, Zhongwei
    Wu, Shengbin
    Shen, Bo
    Huang, Weifeng
    Chang, Chunkang
    Shen, Yuqi
    Ren, Hong
    Yuan, Qing
    Song, Xiaolian
    Duo, Xuming
    Zhang, Hong
    Yang, Wanqiu
    Yang, Jiansong
    Zhang, Jing
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 : S256 - S262
  • [32] Monitoring vancomycin in an intensive care unit: A retrospective survey on 66 patients
    Commandeur, D.
    Giacardi, C.
    Des Deserts, M. Danguy
    Huynh, S.
    Buguet-Brown, M. L.
    Ould-Ahmed, M.
    Drouillard, I.
    MEDECINE ET MALADIES INFECTIEUSES, 2011, 41 (08): : 410 - 414
  • [33] Optimizing outcomes using vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with MRSA bacteremia: trough concentrations or area under the curve?
    Johnston, Madeline M.
    Huang, Vanthida
    Hall, Scott T.
    Buckley, Mitchell S.
    Bikin, Dale
    Barletta, Jeffrey F.
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2021, 101 (02)
  • [34] Impact of the vancomycin and amikacin therapeutic monitoring in the optimization of antimicrobial dose in pediatric patients
    Chavez M, Paula
    Fernandez H, Aivlys
    Hernandez M, Ruben
    Delpiano M, Luis
    REVISTA CHILENA DE INFECTOLOGIA, 2021, 38 (03): : 317 - 323
  • [35] Recent Advances in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Voriconazole, Mycophenolic Acid, and Vancomycin: A Literature Review of Pediatric Studies
    Resztak, Matylda
    Sobiak, Joanna
    Czyrski, Andrzej
    PHARMACEUTICS, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [36] Clinical Evaluation of Vancomycin Dosage in Pediatric Oncology Patients
    Sanders, Stefan J. W. J.
    Bijleveld, Yuma A.
    Sinkeler, Fleur
    Kemper, Elles M.
    Pajkrt, Dasja
    van de Wetering, Marianne
    van Eijkelenburg, Natasha K. A.
    Mathot, Ron A. A.
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2014, 33 (07) : 731 - 733
  • [37] The importance of dosing interval in limiting vancomycin AUC with trough monitoring
    Nix, David E.
    Villanueva, Juan E.
    Matthias, Kathryn R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2020, 77 (06) : 487 - 492
  • [38] Clinical Response and Hospital Costs of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Vancomycin in Elderly Patients
    Kim, Yun
    Kim, Soohyun
    Park, Jinsook
    Lee, Howard
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [39] Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients treated with intermittent haemodialysis based on therapeutic drug monitoring
    Hartinger, Jan Miroslav
    Sima, Martin
    Hronova, Karolina
    Halouzkova, Barbora Agatha
    Szonowska, Barbora
    Polakovic, Vladimir
    Bednarova, Vladimira
    Hladinova, Zuzana
    Tesar, Vladimir
    Slanar, Ondrej
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 34 (03) : 149 - 156
  • [40] Vancomycin dosing, monitoring and toxicity: Critical review of the clinical practice
    Zamoner, Welder
    Sousa Prado, Iara Ranona
    Balbi, Andre Luis
    Ponce, Daniela
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PHARMACOLOGY AND PHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 46 (04) : 292 - 301