Gaining from explaining: Learning improves from explaining to fictitious others on video, not from writing to them

被引:79
作者
Hoogerheide, Vincent [1 ,2 ]
Deijkers, Lian [1 ,3 ]
Loyens, Sofie M. M. [1 ,4 ]
Heijltjes, Anita [3 ]
van Gog, Tamara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Inst Psychol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Educ, POB 80140, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Avans Univ Appl Sci, Learning & Innovat Ctr, Breda, Netherlands
[4] Univ Coll Roosevelt, Roosevelt Ctr Excellence Educ, Middelburg, Netherlands
关键词
Explanations; Social presence; Teaching expectancy; Video creation; Writing; WORKED-OUT EXAMPLES; SELF-EXPLANATIONS; INSTRUCTIONAL EXPLANATIONS; PERCEIVED COMPETENCE; SOCIAL FACILITATION; MODELING EXAMPLES; COGNITIVE-LOAD; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; AVERTED GAZE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.005
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Two experiments investigated whether studying a text with an "explanation intention" and then actually explaining it to (fictitious) other students in writing, would yield the same benefits as previously found for explaining on video. Experiment 1 had participants first studying a text either with the intention to explain it to others or to complete a test, and subsequently restudying vs. explaining in writing. Neither study intention nor explaining affected learning outcomes. Experiment 2 directly compared explaining in writing and on video. Participants studied a text with a test intention followed by restudy, or study with an explanation intention followed by either explaining in writing or on video. Explaining on video, but not in writing, enhanced learning more than restudy. These findings suggest that the benefits of explaining on video are not a result of engaging in explanation per se. Results are discussed in light of feelings of social presence. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 106
页数:12
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Social facilitation from Triplett to electronic performance monitoring [J].
Aiello, JR ;
Douthitt, EA .
GROUP DYNAMICS-THEORY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2001, 5 (03) :163-180
[2]   An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor [J].
Aleven, VAWMM ;
Koedinger, KR .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (02) :147-179
[3]  
Andersen J.F., 1979, COMMUNICATION YB, V3, P543, DOI [10.1080/23808985.1979.11923782, DOI 10.1080/23808985.1979.11923782]
[4]  
Andresen MA, 2009, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V12, P249
[5]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING GENERATIVE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CAMBRIDGE HDB MULTIM, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139547369.017
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2009, ONLINE J DISTANCE LE
[8]   Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function [J].
Arnsten, Amy F. T. .
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 10 (06) :410-422
[9]   Transitioning from studying examples to solving problems: Effects of self-explanation prompts and fading worked-out steps [J].
Atkinson, RK ;
Renkl, A ;
Merrill, MM .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 95 (04) :774-783
[10]   The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis [J].
Bangert-Drowns, RL ;
Hurley, MM ;
Wilkinson, B .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2004, 74 (01) :29-58