Landslide inventory and susceptibility models considering the landslide typology using deep learning: Himalayas, India

被引:29
作者
Bera, Somnath [1 ]
Upadhyay, Vaibhav Kumar [2 ]
Guru, Balamurugan [1 ,3 ]
Oommen, Thomas [4 ]
机构
[1] Tata Inst Social Sci, Jamsetji Tata Sch Disaster Studies, Ctr Geoinformat, VN Purav Marg, Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Kanpur, Civil Engn, Geoinformat Div, Kanpur 208016, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Cent Univ Tamil Nadu, Sch Earth Sci, Dept Geol, Thiruvarur, India
[4] Michigan Technol Univ, Dept Geol & Min Engn & Sci, 1400 Townsend Dr, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
关键词
Landslide inventory; Landslide typology; Deep learning; Spatial agreement; Kalimpong (Himalayas); LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DECISION TREE; AREA; LANDSCAPE; ALGORITHM; CHINA; SLOPE;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-021-04731-8
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Landslide susceptibility modeling is complex as it involves different types of landslides and diverse interests of the end-user. Developing mitigation strategies for the landslides depends on their typology. Therefore, a landslide susceptibility based on different types should be more appealing than a susceptibility model based on a single inventory set. In this research, susceptibility models are generated considering the different types of landslides. Prior to the development of the model, we analyzed landslide inventory for understanding the complexity and scope of alternative landslide susceptibility mapping. We conducted this work by examining a case study of Kalimpong region (Himalayas), characterized by different types of landslides. The landslide inventory was analyzed based on its differential attributes, such as movement types, state of activity, material type, distribution, style, and failure mechanism. From the landslide inventory, debris slides, rockslides, and rockfalls were identified to generate two landslide susceptibility models using deep learning algorithms. The findings showed high accuracy for both models (above 0.90), although the spatial agreement is highly varied among the models.
引用
收藏
页码:1257 / 1289
页数:33
相关论文
共 104 条
[21]   Producing landslide-susceptibility maps for regional planning in data-scarce regions [J].
De Graff, Jerome V. ;
Romesburg, H. Charles ;
Ahmad, Rafi ;
McCalpin, James P. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 64 (01) :729-749
[22]   Historical landslides in Nicaragua - collection and analysis of data [J].
Devoli, Graziella ;
Morales, Alejandro ;
Hoeg, Kaare .
LANDSLIDES, 2007, 4 (01) :5-18
[23]   A spatially explicit deep learning neural network model for the prediction of landslide susceptibility [J].
Dong Van Dao ;
Jaafari, Abolfazl ;
Bayat, Mahmoud ;
Mafi-Gholami, Davood ;
Qi, Chongchong ;
Moayedi, Hossein ;
Tran Van Phong ;
Hai-Bang Ly ;
Tien-Thinh Le ;
Phan Trong Trinh ;
Chinh Luu ;
Nguyen Kim Quoc ;
Bui Nhi Thanh ;
Binh Thai Pham .
CATENA, 2020, 188
[24]   Different sampling strategies for predicting landslide susceptibilities are deemed less consequential with deep learning [J].
Dou, Jie ;
Yunus, Ali P. ;
Merghadi, Abdelaziz ;
Shirzadi, Ataollah ;
Hoang Nguyen ;
Hussain, Yawar ;
Avtar, Ram ;
Chen, Yulong ;
Binh Thai Pham ;
Yamagishi, Hiromitsu .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 720
[25]   Oceanic Mesoscale Eddy Detection Method Based on Deep Learning [J].
Duo, Zijun ;
Wang, Wenke ;
Wang, Huizan .
REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 11 (16)
[26]  
Elmoulat M., 2018, GEOMATICS NAT HAZARD
[27]   A GIS tool for infinite slope stability analysis (GIS-TISSA) [J].
Escobar-Wolf, Rudiger ;
Sanders, Jonathon D. ;
Vishnu, C. L. ;
Oommen, Thomas ;
Sajinkumar, K. S. .
GEOSCIENCE FRONTIERS, 2021, 12 (02) :756-768
[28]  
Fell R., 2007, Q J ENG GEOL HYDROGE
[29]  
Finlay S., 2012, Credit Scoring, Response Modeling, and Insurance Rating: A Practical Guide to Forecasting Consumer Behavior
[30]   Global fatal landslide occurrence from 2004 to 2016 [J].
Froude, Melanie J. ;
Petley, David N. .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 18 (08) :2161-2181