FAIRNESS PREFERENCE BASED DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR CONCESSION PERIOD IN PPP PROJECTS

被引:11
作者
Yan, Xue [1 ]
Chong, Heap-Yih [2 ]
Zhou, Jing [1 ]
Sheng, Zhaohan [1 ]
Xu, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Management & Engn, 22 Hankou Rd, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家自然科学基金重大项目;
关键词
Concession period; fairness preference; Nash bargaining game; PPP projects; PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS; GAME-THEORY; NEGOTIATION;
D O I
10.3934/jimo.2018137
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Both government and private sector have the characteristic of fairness preference when deciding a suitable concession period for infrastructure projects. The appropriate concession period is helpful to construct the Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) project, to alleviate governments financial burden, and to boast the economic growth. Therefore, this paper aims to develop a decision-making model of concession period with fairness preference based on the two sides equitable utilities. To better describe decision makers fair psychology, the Nash bargaining game solution was adopted as a fair reference point. The results show that the concession period with fairness preference will become longer than that without fairness preference. Furthermore, the longer the concession period is, the better construction quality of the infrastructure project (highway) is. So, decision makers with fairness preference tend to make good decisions. In conclusion, the developed decision-making model renders useful references for both government and private sector in negotiating the concession period for infrastructure projects.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A risk-adjusted decoupled-net-present-value model to determine the optimal concession period of BOT projects [J].
Nguyen, Nhat ;
Almarri, Khalid ;
Boussabaine, Halim .
BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2021, 11 (01) :4-21
[42]   Supplier Selection Decision-Making Model Based on Entropy and Its Application in the Large Aircraft Project [J].
Ding, Chang-hong ;
Yuan, Wen-feng ;
Zhao, Meng ;
Qiu, Wan-hua .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT: INNOVATION AND PRACTICE IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT (VOL 2), 2016, :733-742
[43]   Potential Game-Based Decision-Making for Autonomous Driving [J].
Liu, Mushuang ;
Kolmanovsky, Ilya ;
Tseng, H. Eric ;
Huang, Suzhou ;
Filev, Dimitar ;
Girard, Anouck .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 24 (08) :8014-8027
[44]   Evolutionary Game Model With Group Decision-Making in Signed Social Networks [J].
Qu, Cunquan ;
Ji, Chenlu ;
Zhang, Ming .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 10 (06) :3444-3453
[45]   Decision-making model of elderly service companies under government subsidies [J].
Dong, Junfeng ;
Wang, Mengyuan ;
Jiang, Li ;
Lu, Wenxing ;
Liang, Changyong .
RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024, 58 (02) :1577-1597
[46]   A decision-making model of railway tourist dedicated train operation plan [J].
Liang, Taixin ;
Liu, Shifeng .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 41 (04) :4803-4812
[47]   Robot soccer confrontation decision-making technology based on MOGM: Multi-objective game model [J].
Shi Haobin ;
Zhang Lin ;
Pan Wei ;
Wang Shichao .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 28 (02) :713-724
[48]   Conflicts and Cooperation in Brownfield Redevelopment Projects: Application of Conjoint Analysis and Game Theory to Model Strategic Decision Making [J].
Blokhuis, E. G. J. ;
Snijders, C. C. P. ;
Han, Q. ;
Schaefer, W. F. .
JOURNAL OF URBAN PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2012, 138 (03) :195-205
[49]   Principal-agent model with channel network based on retailers having fairness preference [J].
Wang, Kai-Hong ;
Ding, Chuan .
Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2015, 30 (03) :565-571
[50]   Study on the Attacking Intelligent Decision-Making Technology Based on the Game Theory [J].
Zhang, Yun .
AUTOMATIC CONTROL AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2019, 53 (02) :140-147