FAIRNESS PREFERENCE BASED DECISION-MAKING MODEL FOR CONCESSION PERIOD IN PPP PROJECTS

被引:10
作者
Yan, Xue [1 ]
Chong, Heap-Yih [2 ]
Zhou, Jing [1 ]
Sheng, Zhaohan [1 ]
Xu, Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Management & Engn, 22 Hankou Rd, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Curtin Univ, Sch Built Environm, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家自然科学基金重大项目;
关键词
Concession period; fairness preference; Nash bargaining game; PPP projects; PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS; GAME-THEORY; NEGOTIATION;
D O I
10.3934/jimo.2018137
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Both government and private sector have the characteristic of fairness preference when deciding a suitable concession period for infrastructure projects. The appropriate concession period is helpful to construct the Public-Private-Partnership (PPP) project, to alleviate governments financial burden, and to boast the economic growth. Therefore, this paper aims to develop a decision-making model of concession period with fairness preference based on the two sides equitable utilities. To better describe decision makers fair psychology, the Nash bargaining game solution was adopted as a fair reference point. The results show that the concession period with fairness preference will become longer than that without fairness preference. Furthermore, the longer the concession period is, the better construction quality of the infrastructure project (highway) is. So, decision makers with fairness preference tend to make good decisions. In conclusion, the developed decision-making model renders useful references for both government and private sector in negotiating the concession period for infrastructure projects.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 23
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Tournament incentive mechanisms based on fairness preference in large-scale water diversion projects
    Han, Han
    Wang, Zhuofu
    Liu, Bo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 265
  • [32] A stochastic game net-based model for effective decision-making in smart environments
    Sandhu, Rajinder
    Sood, Sandeep K.
    [J]. CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2017, 29 (20)
  • [33] Consensus-based intelligent group decision-making model for the selection of advanced technology
    Choudhury, A. K.
    Shankar, Ravi
    Tiwari, M. K.
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, 42 (03) : 1776 - 1799
  • [34] An opponent model for agent-based shared decision-making via a genetic algorithm
    Lin, Kai-Biao
    Wei, Ying
    Liu, Yong
    Hong, Fei-Ping
    Yang, Yi-Min
    Lu, Ping
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [35] Intelligent decision-making model based on minority game for resource allocation in cloud manufacturing
    Carlucci, Daniela
    Renna, Paolo
    Materi, Sergio
    Schiuma, Giovanni
    [J]. MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2020, 58 (11) : 2305 - 2325
  • [36] The principal-agent model in venture investment based on fairness preference
    Xu, Dongsheng
    Liu, Qingqing
    Jiang, Xin
    [J]. AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2021, 6 (03): : 2171 - 2195
  • [37] Multiple principal-agent relationships model based on fairness preference
    Tuo, Yonggui
    Zhao, Chenyuan
    Zhao, Xu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DISCRETE MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES & CRYPTOGRAPHY, 2018, 21 (04) : 837 - 848
  • [38] Bilateral negotiation model for intelligent decision-making under uncertainty
    Pham Vu Hong Son
    Leu, Sou-Sen
    Luong Duc Long
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 54 (02) : 89 - 95
  • [39] A risk-adjusted decoupled-net-present-value model to determine the optimal concession period of BOT projects
    Nguyen, Nhat
    Almarri, Khalid
    Boussabaine, Halim
    [J]. BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2021, 11 (01) : 4 - 21
  • [40] Supplier Selection Decision-Making Model Based on Entropy and Its Application in the Large Aircraft Project
    Ding, Chang-hong
    Yuan, Wen-feng
    Zhao, Meng
    Qiu, Wan-hua
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT: INNOVATION AND PRACTICE IN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT (VOL 2), 2016, : 733 - 742