Comparison and reliability of techniques to estimate live cattle body weight

被引:41
|
作者
Wangchuk, Kesang [1 ]
Wangdi, Jigme [1 ]
Mindu, Mindu [2 ]
机构
[1] Dept Livestock, Minist Agr & Forests, Res & Extens Div, Thimphu 11001, Bhutan
[2] Natl Highland Res & Dev Ctr, Minist Agr & Forests, Dept Livestock, Bumthang, Bhutan
关键词
Body weight; Brown Swiss; cattle; Jersey Cross; technique; CONDITION SCORE; ZEBU COWS; PREDICTION; LIVEWEIGHT;
D O I
10.1080/09712119.2017.1302876
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Five different techniques of estimating the live cattle body weight were evaluated with the objective to identify the most reliable technique for use in the field. Weighbridge was used as the reference for other techniques. The measurement techniques evaluated were Weighbridge, Weigh tape, Rondo tape, Schaeffer's formula, Agarwal's formula, and calculator method. The body weights of 89 Brown Swiss and 34 Jersey Cross cattle were estimated by each technique. Compared with Weighbridge, the body weight estimates in Brown Swiss cattle exceeded by about 70 and 66 kg for Agarwal's formula and Rondo tape, respectively. In Jersey Cross cattle, the estimates exceeded by about 122 and 84 kg for Agarwal's formula and Rondo tape, respectively. In both breeds, the estimates of Schaeffer's formula were not significantly different from the Weighbridge. The estimates of weight tape were also not significantly different from the Weighbridge although the estimates exceeded by over 21 kg in Brown Swiss cattle and over 44 kg in Jersey Cross cattle. The study concluded that Schaeffer's formula is the most reliable of all techniques to estimate live body weight of cattle, followed by weigh tape. Agarwal's formula and Rondo tape are less reliable and their use in the field must be discontinued.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 352
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic variance of metabolomic features and their relationship with body weight and body weight gain in Holstein cattle
    Aliakbari, Amir
    Ehsani, Alireza
    Torshizi, Rasoul Vaez
    Lovendahl, Peter
    Esfandyari, Hadi
    Jensen, Just
    Sarup, Pernille
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 (09) : 3832 - 3844
  • [22] Body weight prediction using digital image analysis for slaughtered beef cattle
    Bozkurt, Y.
    Aktan, S.
    Ozkaya, S.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2007, 32 (02) : 195 - 198
  • [23] Adjusting for age can lead to biased genetic evaluation for body weight in cattle
    Bittante, G.
    Cecchinato, A.
    Dal Zotto, R.
    De Marchi, M.
    Penasa, M.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2011, 140 (1-3) : 1 - 7
  • [25] A comparison of commonly used and novel electronic techniques for evaluating cattle temperament
    Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S.
    Shah, M. A.
    Church, J. S.
    Haley, D. B.
    Janzen, K.
    Truong, G.
    Atkins, R. P.
    Crowe, T. G.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 92 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [26] Predicting The Growth Curve of Body Weight in Madura Cattle
    Hartati, Hartati
    Pintaka Bayu Putra, Widya
    KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2021, 27 (04) : 431 - 437
  • [27] A first meta-analysis study on body weight prediction method for beef cattle based on digital image processing
    Firdaus, Frediansyah
    Atmoko, Bayu Andri
    Ibrahim, Alek
    Nugroho, Tristianto
    Baliarti, Endang
    Panjono, Panjono
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED VETERINARY AND ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2024, 11 (01) : 153 - 160
  • [28] Mastectomy in cattle: Comparison of four surgical techniques
    Dehghani, SN
    Baniadam, A
    WORLD ASSOCIATION FOR BUIATRICS - XIX CONGRESS, VOLS 1-3: VOLS 1-2: PROCEEDINGS; VOL 3: POSTER PRESENTATION, 1996, : 678 - 682
  • [29] The relationship of parameters of body measures and body weight by using digital image analysis in pre-slaughter cattle
    Ozkaya, Serkan
    Bozkurt, Yalcin
    ARCHIV FUR TIERZUCHT-ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL BREEDING, 2008, 51 (02): : 120 - 128
  • [30] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BODY CONDITION SCORE, MILK PRODUCTIVITY AND LIVE WEIGHT OF DAIRY COWS
    Petrovska, Solvita
    Jonkus, Daina
    RESEARCH FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT 2014, VOL 1, 2014, : 100 - 106