Life cycle assessment of waste strategies for used lubricating oil

被引:15
作者
Hassanain, Eslam M. [1 ]
Yacout, Dalia M. M. [2 ]
Metwally, M. A. [3 ]
Hassouna, M. S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Petr & Mineral Resources, Dept Distillat, APC, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Alexandria Univ, Inst Grad Studies & Res, Dept Environm Studies, Alexandria, Egypt
[3] Minist Petr & Mineral Resources, Middle East Oil Refinery MIDOR, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
Egypt; Environmental impacts; Used lubricating oil; Waste recovery;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-016-1255-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose The study aimed to evaluate the environmental impacts of used lubricating oil (ULO) recovery in the largest oil consumer country in Africa, Egypt. The main questions were: What are the impacts of the different waste management strategies for the recovery of used lubricating oil and which waste management strategy is more eco-friendly? Methods Life cycle assessment (LCA) was employed to model the environmental impacts of the two waste management approaches for used lubricating oil recovery in Egypt: recycling by re-firing and recovery by co-firing. The model was applied to assess the impacts of one of the largest ULO recovery units in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region and the only operating unit in Egypt. The following impact categories were included: global warming potential (GWP), acidification potential (AP), eutrophication potential (EP), carcinogens potential (CP), ecotoxicity potential (ETP), respiratory inorganic formation potential (RIFP), respiratory organic formation potential (ROFP), radiation potential (RP), ozone layer depletion (OLD), mineral depletion (MD), land use (LU) and fossil fuel depletion (FFD). Results and discussion Results indicated that recycling by re-refining strategy is more environment-friendly. De-asphalting, de-aromatization and de-waxing processes are the main processes that affect the environmental impacts of lubricating oil production in both strategies, due to the use of hazard materials and toxic solvents in these processes. Fuel gas and fuel oil used as a fuel in the refinery and power units are the main contributors affecting the environmental impacts in case of recycling by re-refining strategy. The highest impacts were detected on FFD, followed by RIFP, GWP, AP, EP, ETP and CP in both strategies; no impacts were detected on RP, OLD and MD. Conclusions It can be concluded that recycling by re-refining of ULO is the more eco-friendly approach. This strategy is more energy conservative, saves a diminishing fossil fuel resource and reduces burdens on the environment. ULO containing high percentages of additive remnants such as viscosity index improvers and pour point depressants which represents a valuable resource and its proper management should be given the most attention.
引用
收藏
页码:1232 / 1240
页数:9
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Moving towards an Egyptian national life cycle inventory database [J].
Ali, Ahmed AbdelMonteleb Mohammed ;
Negm, Abdelazim Mohammed ;
Bady, Mahmoud Farghly ;
Ibrahim, Mona Gamal Eldin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2014, 19 (08) :1551-1558
[2]  
[Anonymous], ISO14041
[3]  
APC, 2015, ON EG GEN PETR AUTH
[4]  
Eni Spa, 2014, WORLD OIL GAS REV
[5]  
Goedkoop M, 2008, INTRO LCA SIMAPRO 7
[6]  
ISO, 2006, 140442006AMD22020 IS, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11367-011-0297-3
[7]  
John P, 2005, WASTE MANAGEMENT PRA
[8]  
Kajdas C, 1994, ESSL C 1994
[9]   Used lubricating oil management options based on life cycle thinking [J].
Kanokkantapong, Vorapot ;
Kiatkittipong, Worapon ;
Panyapinyopol, Bunyarit ;
Wongsuchoto, Porntip ;
Pavasant, Prasert .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2009, 53 (05) :294-299
[10]   Life cycle assessment of an industrial symbiosis based on energy recovery from dried sludge and used oil [J].
Liu, Qiang ;
Jiang, Peipei ;
Zhao, Jun ;
Zhang, Bo ;
Bian, Huadan ;
Qian, Guangren .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (15) :1700-1708