Cost Minimization with Optimal CO2 Mitigation Options for the Steelmaking Industry

被引:4
|
作者
Ba-Shammakh, Mohammad S. [1 ]
机构
[1] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Chem Engn Dept, POB 5050, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
关键词
EMISSION-REDUCTION; STEEL-INDUSTRY; CHINA IRON; TECHNOLOGIES;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b02544
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The energy-intensive production process for the steelmaking industry has been the focus nowadays because it contributes directly to the global warming issue. There are several processes within the steelmaking industry that contribute to this issue by emitting CO2 emissions mainly from combustion of fossil fuel to supply the desired energy. There are different ways to control these emissions, and improving energy efficiency is one way to do that. Nowadays, there are several advanced techniques or technologies that can reduce CO2 emissions further. One of these options is using less carbon fuel, leading to less CO2 emissions. Another technique that can achieve higher reduction targets is CO2 capture. In this study, a mixed integer nonlinear programming model is developed to select the least cost CO2 reduction technologies for different reduction targets for a steelmaking plant. The options considered are improvement of energy efficiency, fuel switching, and application of capture technologies. The results show that improvement of energy efficiency is not a promising option at different reduction targets because it can achieve very low reduction targets. Fuel switching has to be implemented to achieve a CO2 reduction target up to 30%. The steel production cost increases up to $483/ton if the fuel switching option is applied. Carbon capture using monoethanolamine is applied if the reduction target is higher than 30% and the cost of steel produced increases to about $617/ton at a reduction target of 65%.
引用
收藏
页码:11439 / 11445
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An overview of CO2 mitigation options for global warming -: Emphasizing CO2 sequestration options
    Yamasaki, A
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN, 2003, 36 (04) : 361 - 375
  • [2] Technology options for CO2 mitigation in China
    He, JK
    Zhang, AL
    Ye, Y
    AMBIO, 1996, 25 (04) : 249 - 253
  • [3] The current situation on CO2 emissions from the steel industry in Thailand and mitigation options
    Sodsai, Promtida
    Rachdawong, Pichaya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 6 : 48 - 55
  • [4] Optimal timing of CO2 mitigation policies for a cost-effectiveness model
    Doyen, L.
    Dumas, P.
    Ambrosi, P.
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2008, 48 (5-6) : 882 - 897
  • [5] Impacts of CCS and Other CO2 Mitigation Options on China's Electric Power Industry
    Liu, Tong
    Xu, Gang
    Liu, Xing
    Cai, Peng
    Tian, Longhu
    Huang, Qili
    2010 ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (APPEEC), 2010,
  • [6] SEWGS integration in a direct reduction steelmaking process for CO2 mitigation
    Zecca, Nicola
    Cobden, Paul D.
    Luecking, Leonie
    Manzolini, Giampaolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2023, 130
  • [7] IS CO2 MITIGATION COST-EFFECTIVE?
    Christopher Monckton of Brenchley
    INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON NUCLEAR WAR AND PLANETARY EMERGENCIES: 45TH SESSION, 2013, : 167 - 182
  • [8] CO2 emission model and reduction strategy of the steelmaking industry
    Bai, Hao
    Liu, Pu
    Li, Hong-Xu
    Zhao, Li-Hua
    Cang, Da-Qiang
    Beijing Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2010, 32 (12): : 1623 - 1629
  • [9] Optimization of a membrane process for CO2 capture in the steelmaking industry
    Lie, Jon Arvid
    Vassbotn, Terje
    Hagg, May-Britt
    Grainger, David
    Kim, Taek-Joong
    Mejdell, Thor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (03) : 309 - 317
  • [10] Energy industry examining CO2 sequestration options
    Ball, Dave
    Gupta, Neeraj
    Metzger, Bernhard
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2007, 105 (18) : 20 - +