Reimbursement outcomes of a pharmacist-physician co-visit model in a Federally Qualified Health Center

被引:7
作者
Gonzalvo, Jasmine D. [1 ]
Kenneally, Allison M. [2 ]
Pence, Lauren [3 ]
Walroth, Todd [3 ]
Schmelz, Andrew N. [4 ]
Nace, Nicole [3 ]
Chang, Juan [3 ]
Meredith, Ashley H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Eskenazi Hlth, Coll Pharm, Indianapolis, IN USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Eskenazi Hlth, Indianapolis, IN USA
[4] Butler Univ, Eskenazi Hlth, Indianapolis, IN 46208 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY | 2021年 / 4卷 / 06期
关键词
billing; reimbursement; FQHC; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES; IMPACT; CARE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/jac5.1416
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background Pharmacists have demonstrated a positive impact in providing patient care in ambulatory settings. Pharmacists have faced multiple barriers to reimbursement, especially in a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) setting. A commonly cited barrier is lack of recognition as providers under Medicare. Objectives The objective of this study was to describe the reimbursement potential, physician appointment capacity, and billing levels with the use of a pharmacist-physician co-visit model in an urban FQHC. Methods This was a retrospective, observational cohort study. Patient visits were included in the co-visit model cohort if they were completed with the pharmacist and/or collaborating physician on the same clinic half-day from May-September 2019. Comparator group patient visits were included in the physician-only cohort if they were with one of five physicians practicing at the FQHC on a day without the pharmacist. Patient visits were excluded if the visit was nonbillable. Results Realized reimbursement per half-day in clinic [mean (SD)], was significantly less with the physician-only visits compared to the co-visit billing model [$558 (242) vs $850 (410), P = .001]. The addition of a pharmacist through the co-visit billing model increased the median (IQR) billing per half-day in clinic from $1613 (1173, 1788) to $2108 (1832,2620) (P < .001), and the median (IQR) number of patients seen per half-day from 9 (7, 10) to 12 (10, 14) (P < .001). Unpaid patient bills ($39 599) were excluded from reimbursement analysis in both groups. Conclusions The pharmacist-physician co-visit model in an FQHC increased revenue to justify the addition of one full-time equivalent position within our facility, increased the number of patients seen by the physician, allowed for higher-complexity billing, and provided physicians with variety in responsibilities. The benefits of team-based care extend beyond the financial implications of a co-visit model. Without direct pharmacist-billing mechanisms, this model justifies the expansion of pharmacist-managed services.
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 673
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research, PHYS BURNOUT
[2]  
Aneese Nadia J, 2018, Am J Manag Care, V24, pSP116
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Collaborative practice agreements and pharmacists' patient care services: a resource for pharmacists
[4]  
ASHP Section of Ambulatory Care Practitioners, 2019, FAQ PHARM BILL US IN
[5]  
Board of Pharmacy Specialties, 2019, ANN REPORT, V61, P2019
[6]   Impact of Pharmacist-Physician Collaboration on Osteoporosis Treatment Rates [J].
Bowers, Brandi L. ;
Drew, Amy M. ;
Verry, Christian .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 52 (09) :876-883
[7]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, INT ONL MAN 100 04, pCH 12
[8]  
Coffey J., 2014, PHARM BILLING AMBULA, P1
[9]   Incident-to Billing for Pharmacists [J].
Dietrich, Eric ;
Gums, John G. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2018, 24 (12) :1273-1276
[10]   Collaborative care for depression - A cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes [J].
Gilbody, Simon ;
Bower, Peter ;
Fletcher, Janine ;
Richards, David ;
Sutton, Alex J. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2006, 166 (21) :2314-2321