Experimental investigation on hypersonic shock-shock interaction control using plasma actuator array

被引:18
作者
Tang, Mengxiao [1 ]
Wu, Yun [2 ]
Wang, Hongyu [3 ]
机构
[1] 92728 Unit PLA, Shanghai 200436, Peoples R China
[2] Air Force Engn Univ, Sci & Technol Plasma Dynam Lab, Xian 710038, Peoples R China
[3] China Aerodynam Res & Dev Ctr, Hyperveloc Aerodynam Inst, Mianyang 621000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hypersonic flow; Shock -shock interaction; Thermal protection; Flow control; Plasma actuator array; HEAT-FLUX REDUCTION; THERMAL PROTECTION; LAYER INTERACTION; DISCHARGE; FLOW; JET; PRESSURE; WAVERIDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.010
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this paper, the hypersonic shock-shock interaction control using plasma actuator array is experimentally studied to explore a new surface thermal protection method of hypersonic aircraft. The typical flow structure is produced by a double-wedge model abstracting from the rudder component, and the high schlieren imaging, as well as pressure-sensitive paint/temperature-sensitive paint measurement system, are adopted for flow diagnostics with and without actuation. The results shows that the shock-shock interaction system can be controlled by the plasma actuator array in Ma = 6.0 and Ma = 8.0, and the latter case has a better control outcome where the complicated shock-shock interaction system can be modified to one single oblique wave structure. It indicates that the heat flow amplification effect induced by shock-shock interaction can be alleviated. Also, the increase in energy deposition is proved to have a positive impact on the control outcome, namely the higher energy deposition brings in a better control effect. At last, a preliminary conceptual model is established to reveal the probable thermal protection mechanism. The virtual curved compression surface produced by the high-energy plasma actuator array plays an important role in achieving shock-shock interaction control.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 586
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Bedin A. P., 1995, Technical Physics Letters, V21, P5
[2]   Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions [J].
Clemens, Noel T. ;
Narayanaswamy, Venkateswaran .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 46, 2014, 46 :469-492
[3]  
Edney B., 1968, 115 FFA AER RES I SW
[4]   Plasma control of shock wave configuration in off-design mode of M=2 inlet [J].
Falempin, Francois ;
Firsov, Alexander A. ;
Yarantsev, Dmitry A. ;
Goldfeld, Marat A. ;
Timofeev, Konstantin ;
Leonov, Sergey B. .
EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS, 2015, 56 (03)
[5]   Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions [J].
Gaitonde, Datta V. .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2015, 72 :80-99
[6]   Shock wave boundary layer interaction controlled by surface arc plasma actuators [J].
Gan, Tian ;
Wu, Yun ;
Sun, Zhengzhong ;
Jin, Di ;
Song, Huimin ;
Jia, Min .
PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2018, 30 (05)
[7]  
Glagolev A. I., 1995, Fluid Dynamics, V30, P120, DOI 10.1007/BF02029936
[8]   The effect of heat and mass addition on the base pressure of bodies of revolution at supersonic speeds [J].
Glagolev, AI ;
Zubkov, AI ;
Garanin, AF ;
Tretyakov, PK .
COMBUSTION EXPLOSION AND SHOCK WAVES, 1996, 32 (03) :331-335
[9]   Fast Pressure-Sensitive Paint for Flow and Acoustic Diagnostics [J].
Gregory, James W. ;
Sakaue, Hirotaka ;
Liu, Tianshu ;
Sullivan, John P. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 46, 2014, 46 :303-330
[10]   Active flow control by a novel combinational active thermal protection for hypersonic vehicles [J].
Huang, Jie ;
Yao, Wei-Xing .
ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2020, 170 :320-330