Assessment of RANS turbulence models and Zwart cavitation model empirical coefficients for the simulation of unsteady cloud cavitation

被引:51
作者
Geng, Linlin [1 ]
Escaler, Xavier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Catalunya BarcelonaTech UPC, Ctr Ind Diagnost & Fluid Dynam CDIF, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Cloud cavitation; turbulence model; Zwart model; near wall grid; shedding process; 2D hydrofoil; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID-DYNAMICS; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; SHEET; FLOW; PREDICTION; JET;
D O I
10.1080/19942060.2019.1694996
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The numerical simulation of unsteady cavitation flows is sensitive to the selected models and associated parameters. Consequently, three Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models and the Zwart cavitation model were selected to assess their performance for the simulation of cloud cavitation on 2D hydrofoils. The experimental cavitation tests from a NACA65012 hydrofoil at different hydrodynamic conditions were used as a reference to tune the modeling parameters and the experimental tests from a NACA0015 were finally used to validate them. The effects of near wall grid refinement, time step, iterations and mesh elements were also investigated. The results indicate that the Shear Stress Transport (SST) model is sensitive to near wall grid resolution which should be fine enough. Moreover, the cavitation morphology and dynamic behavior are sensitive to the selection of the Zwart empirical vaporization, F-v, and condensation, F-c, coefficients. Therefore, a multiple linear regression approach with the single objective of predicting the shedding frequency was carried out that permitted to find the range of coefficient values giving the most accurate results. In addition, it was observed that they provided a better prediction of the vapor volume fraction and of the instantaneous pressure pulse generated by the main cloud cavity collapse.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 167
页数:17
相关论文
共 46 条
[41]   Investigations of empirical coefficients of cavitation and turbulence model through steady and unsteady turbulent cavitating flows [J].
Tseng, Chien-Chou ;
Wang, Li-Jie .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2014, 103 :262-274
[42]   Recent progress in modeling of cryogenic cavitation for liquid rocket propulsion [J].
Utturkar, Y ;
Wu, JY ;
Wang, GY ;
Shyy, W .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2005, 41 (07) :558-608
[43]   Sensitivity evaluation of a transport-based turbulent cavitation model [J].
Vaidyanathan, R ;
Senocak, I ;
Wu, JY ;
Shyy, W .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2003, 125 (03) :447-458
[44]  
Van Rijsbergen M., 2012, P 8 INT S CAV CAV201
[45]   Dynamics of attached turbulent cavitating flows [J].
Wang, GY ;
Senocak, I ;
Shyy, W ;
Ikohagi, T ;
Cao, SL .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2001, 37 (06) :551-581
[46]   Comparison of compressible and incompressible numerical methods in simulation of a cavitating jet through a poppet valve [J].
Yuan, Cong ;
Song, Jinchun ;
Liu, Minghe .
ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2019, 13 (01) :67-90