Long-term results of electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter for treatment of proximal GERD

被引:14
作者
Hoppo, Toshitaka [1 ]
Rodriguez, Leonardo [2 ]
Soffer, Edy [3 ]
Crowell, Michael D. [4 ]
Jobe, Blair A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Penn Hosp, Allegheny Hlth Network, Inst Treatment Esophageal & Thorac Dis, Pittsburgh, PA 15224 USA
[2] CCO Obesidad & Diabet, Dept Surg, Santiago, Chile
[3] Univ So Calif, Dept Gastroenterol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Gastroenterol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2014年 / 28卷 / 12期
关键词
GERD; Electrical stimulation; Surgical treatment; Proximal GERD; GASTROESOPHAGEAL-REFLUX DISEASE; PROTON PUMP INHIBITORS; RANDOMIZED-CONTROLLED-TRIALS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; LARYNGOPHARYNGEAL REFLUX; NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION; LAPAROSCOPIC FUNDOPLICATION; LUNG TRANSPLANTATION; CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS; ANTIREFLUX SURGERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-014-3603-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, using EndoStim(A (R)) LES stimulation system (EndoStim BV, the Hague, Netherlands), enhances LES pressure, decrease distal esophageal acid exposure, improves symptoms, and eliminates the need in many patients for daily GERD medications. To evaluate, in a post hoc analysis, the effect of LES stimulation on proximal esophageal acid exposure in a subgroup of patients with abnormal proximal esophageal acid exposure. Nineteen patients (median age 54 years; IQR 47-64; men-10) with GERD partially responsive to proton pump inhibitors (PPI), hiatal hernia a parts per thousand currency sign3 cm, esophagitis a parts per thousand currency signLA grade C underwent laparoscopic implantation of the LES stimulator. LES stimulation at 20 Hz, 215 mu s, 5-8 m Amp sessions was delivered in 6-12, 30 min sessions each day. Esophageal pH at baseline and after 12-months of LES stimulation was measured 5 and 23 cm above the manometric upper border of LES. Total, upright and supine values of median (IQR) proximal esophageal pH at baseline were 0.4 (0.1-1.4), 0.6 (0.2-2.3), and 0 (0.0-0.2) %, respectively, and at 12 months on LES-EST were 0 (0-0) % (p = 0.001 total and upright; p = 0.043 supine comparisons). 24-hour distal esophageal acid exposure improved from 10.2 (7.6-11.7) to 3.4 (1.6-7.0) % (p = 0.001). Seven (37 %) patients had abnormal (> 1.1 %) 24-hour proximal acid exposure at baseline; all normalized at 12 months (p = 0.008). In these 7 patients, total, upright, and supine median proximal acid exposure values at baseline were 1.7 (1.3-4.1), 2.9 (1.9-3.7), and 0.3 (0-4.9) %, respectively, and after 12 months of LES-EST were 0 (0-0.0), 0 (0-0.1), and 0 (0-0) % (p = 0.018 total and upright; p = 0.043 supine comparisons). Distal esophageal pH for this group improved from 9.3 (7.8-17.2) at baseline to 3.2 (1.1-3.7) % at 12-months (p = 0.043). There were no GI side effects such as dysphagia, gas-bloat or diarrhea or device or procedure related serious adverse events with LES-EST. There was also a significant improvement in their GERD-HRQL scores. LES-EST is associated with normalization of proximal esophageal pH in patients with GERD and may be useful in treating those with proximal GERD. The LES-EST is safe without typical side effects associated with traditional antireflux surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:3293 / 3301
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Systematic review: role of acid, weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
    Boeckxstaens, G. E.
    Smout, A.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (03) : 334 - 343
  • [2] The impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on patient-reported quality of life
    Carrau, RL
    Khidr, A
    Crawley, JA
    Hillson, EM
    Davis, JK
    Pashos, CL
    [J]. LARYNGOSCOPE, 2004, 114 (04) : 670 - 674
  • [3] Intra-oesophageal distribution and perception of acid reflux in patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
    Cicala, M
    Emerenziani, S
    Caviglia, R
    Guarino, MPL
    Vavassori, P
    Ribolsi, M
    Carotti, S
    Pettiti, T
    Pallone, F
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2003, 18 (06) : 605 - 613
  • [4] An endoscopically implantable device stimulates the lower esophageal sphincter on demand by remote control: a study using a canine model
    Clarke, J. O.
    Jagannath, S. B.
    Kalloo, A. N.
    Long, V. R.
    Beitler, D. M.
    Kantsevoy, S. V.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 39 (01) : 72 - 76
  • [5] Characteristics and clinical relevance of proximal esophageal pH monitoring
    Cool, M
    Poelmans, J
    Feenstra, L
    Tack, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (12) : 2317 - 2323
  • [6] NISSEN FUNDOPLICATION FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE - EVALUATION OF PRIMARY REPAIR IN 100 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS
    DEMEESTER, TR
    BONAVINA, L
    ALBERTUCCI, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1986, 204 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [7] Effects of Asymptomatic Proximal and Distal Gastroesophageal Reflux on Asthma Severity
    DiMango, Emily
    Holbrook, Janet T.
    Simpson, Erin
    Reibman, Joan
    Richter, Joel
    Narula, Surinder
    Prusakowski, Nancy
    Mastronarde, John G.
    Wise, Robert A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 180 (09) : 809 - 816
  • [8] DOBHAN R, 1993, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V88, P25
  • [9] DONAHUE PE, 1985, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V120, P663
  • [10] Systematic review: persistent reflux symptoms on proton pump inhibitor therapy in primary care and community studies
    El-Serag, H.
    Becher, A.
    Jones, R.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (06) : 720 - 737