CAP payments and spatial diversity in cereal crops: An analysis of Italian farms

被引:14
作者
Capitanio, Fabian [1 ]
Gatto, Elisa [2 ]
Millemaci, Emanuele [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Agr Econ & Policy Dept, Via Univ 96, I-80055 Portici, NA, Italy
[2] Univ Messina, Dipartimento Econ, Piazza Pugliatti 1, I-98122 Messina, Italy
关键词
Crop diversity; CAP; Italian farms; Decoupled subsidy; COMMON AGRICULTURAL POLICY; GENETIC-RESOURCES; PANEL-DATA; BIODIVERSITY; RISK; DETERMINANTS; MANAGEMENT; MODELS; WHEAT; DIVERSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.03.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Agricultural biodiversity conservation has been recognized as a fundamental resource for the maintenance of ecological and economic functions. In this paper, we test the hypothesis that the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has an impact on crop diversity decisions of farm managers. In so doing, we allow the diversity decision to depend on a rich set of economic and agro-ecological variables, such as prices of the most common cereal varieties, and agro-ecological and socio-economic characteristics at farm and regional level. Using a panel dataset over the period 2004-2010, we compare the results obtained from pooled-OLS and dynamic panel GMM estimators. The empirical analysis shows the existence of a positive relationship between CAP payments and diversity. In addition, decoupling subsidies from production seems to have a positive effect on biodiversity. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:574 / 582
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   ESTIMATION OF DYNAMIC-MODELS WITH ERROR-COMPONENTS [J].
ANDERSON, TW ;
HSIAO, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1981, 76 (375) :598-606
[2]   SOME TESTS OF SPECIFICATION FOR PANEL DATA - MONTE-CARLO EVIDENCE AND AN APPLICATION TO EMPLOYMENT EQUATIONS [J].
ARELLANO, M ;
BOND, S .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1991, 58 (02) :277-297
[3]   The common agricultural policy and the determinants of changes in EU farm size [J].
Bartolini, Fabio ;
Viaggi, Davide .
LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 31 :126-135
[4]   Managing increasing environmental risks through agrobiodiversity and agrienvironmental policies [J].
Baumgaertner, Stefan ;
Quaas, Martin F. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 41 (05) :483-496
[5]  
Benin S, 2004, AGR ECON-BLACKWELL, V31, P197, DOI [10.1016/j.agecon.2004.09.007, 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2004.tb00257.x]
[6]   Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models [J].
Blundell, R ;
Bond, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1998, 87 (01) :115-143
[7]   Impacts of Decoupled Agricultural Support on Farm Structure, Biodiversity and Landscape Mosaic: Some EU Results [J].
Brady, Mark ;
Kellermann, Konrad ;
Sahrbacher, Christoph ;
Jelinek, Ladislav .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 60 (03) :563-585
[8]   Farmers' valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources [J].
Brush, SB ;
Meng, E .
GENETIC RESOURCES AND CROP EVOLUTION, 1998, 45 (02) :139-150
[9]   Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices [J].
Buckland, ST ;
Magurran, AE ;
Green, RE ;
Fewster, RM .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2005, 360 (1454) :243-254
[10]  
Chattopadhyay M., 2010, J DEV AGR EC, V2, P340