The process of forest management plans preparation in the Republic of Macedonia: Does it comprise governance principles of participation, transparency and accountability?

被引:13
作者
Stojanovska, M. [1 ]
Miovska, M. [2 ]
Jovanovska, J. [3 ]
Stojanovski, V. [4 ]
机构
[1] UKIM, Fac Forestry, Skopje 1000, Macedonia
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Land Environm Agr & Forestry, Legnaro, PD, Italy
[3] Univ Belgrade, Forest Fac, FOPER II, Belgrade, Serbia
[4] BOKU Univ, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Governance; Transparency; Participation; Accountability; Forest management plans; OWNERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2013.10.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Leaving the centralized and trying to embrace the market economy, the forestry sector of the country has been brought to a challenge of moving from government to the new trend of governance. The paper examines whether governance principles of participation, accountability and transparency are comprised in the process of preparation of forest management plans. By scrutinizing the prevailing governance theory through a relevant legislative content analyses and conducted in-depth interviews with relevant stakeholders, the paper provides findings about cooperative forest policy-making in the process of forest management plan preparation through self organizing networks of participants from policy and society. Results obtained from the Law on forests and other related secondary legislation show that only two entities are involved in the preparation process, whereas the Ministry of forestry, agriculture and water economy and the Public enterprise "Macedonian Forest". On the other hand, results obtained from the conducted in-depth interviews and the legislation content analysis correspond to the situation where the governance principles of participation, transparency and accountability are not respected in the process of creation of forest management plans. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 56
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Agere S., 2000, Promoting good governance: Principles, practices and perspectives
  • [2] Analytica, 2009, PUBL POL AN ADM PROG
  • [3] Baskent E.Z., 2005, FOR ECOL MANAG, V256, P798
  • [4] Brun F., 2002, P INT RES COURS FORM, P217
  • [5] A 'mixed model' for the formulation of a multipurpose mountain forest policy. Theory vs. practice on the example of Kyrgyzstan
    Buttoud, G
    Yunusova, I
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2002, 4 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [6] Buttoud G., 2000, INT WORKSH SUST FUT
  • [7] Buttoud G., 2002, P INT RES COURS FORM, P19
  • [8] Carifio LV, 2000, GOVERNANCE GOVT GOVE
  • [9] Chauvin C., 2002, P RES COURS FORM INT, P63
  • [10] Convention on Biological Diversity, 2000, COP V 6