A Novel Cell Fixation Method that Greatly Enhances Protein Identification in Microproteomic Studies Using Laser Capture Microdissection and Mass Spectrometry

被引:6
作者
Gordon, Ana [1 ]
Kannan, Shravan Kumar [1 ]
Gousset, Karine [1 ]
机构
[1] Calif State Univ Fresno, Biol Dept, 2555 East San Ramon Ave M-S SB73, Fresno, CA 93740 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
dithiobispropionimidate; glutaraldehyde; laser capture microdissection; mass spectrometry;
D O I
10.1002/pmic.201700294
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Microproteomic studies have improved our knowledge of cell biology. Yet, with mass spectrometry (MS) analysis, accuracy can be lost for protein identification and quantification when using heterogeneous samples. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) allows for the enrichment of specific subsets of cells to study their proteome; however, sample fixation is necessary. Unfortunately, fixation hampers MS results due to protein cross-linking. The aim of this study was to identify both a fixation protocol and an extraction method that returns the best yield of proteins for downstream MS analysis, while preserving cellular structures. We compared glutaraldehyde (GLU), a common fixative to preserve cells, to dithiobispropionimidate (DTBP), a cleavable cross-linker. Our DTBP fixation/extraction protocol greatly increased the protein recovery. In fact, while 1000 GLU fixed cells returned only 159 unique protein hits, from 1464 unique peptides of 1994 unique collected spectra, 1000 DTBP fixed cells resulted in 567 unique collected protein hits, from 7542 unique peptides, of 10,401 unique collected spectra. That is, a 3.57-fold increase in protein hits, 5.15-fold increase in unique peptides, and a 5.22-fold increase in unique collected spectra. Overall, the novel protocol introduced here allows for a very efficient protein recovery and good sample quality for MS after sample collection using LCM.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Arike L, 2014, METHODS MOL BIOL, V1156, P213, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-0685-7_14
  • [2] A mass spectrometry-based workflow for the proteomic analysis of in vitro cultured cell subsets isolated by means of laser capture microdissection
    Brioschi, Maura
    Eligini, Sonia
    Crisci, Mauro
    Fiorelli, Susanna
    Tremoli, Elena
    Colli, Susanna
    Banfi, Cristina
    [J]. ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 406 (12) : 2817 - 2825
  • [3] Charulatha V, 2001, J BIOMED MATER RES, V54, P122, DOI 10.1002/1097-4636(200101)54:1<122::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-N
  • [5] Freitas RA., 1999, NANOMEDICINE-UK
  • [6] Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Eleven Common Cell Lines Reveals Ubiquitous but Varying Expression of Most Proteins
    Geiger, Tamar
    Wehner, Anja
    Schaab, Christoph
    Cox, Juergen
    Mann, Matthias
    [J]. MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS, 2012, 11 (03)
  • [7] Myo10 is a key regulator of TNT formation in neuronal cells
    Gousset, Karine
    Marzo, Ludovica
    Commere, Pierre-Henri
    Zurzolo, Chiara
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE, 2013, 126 (19) : 4424 - 4435
  • [8] Microproteomics: Analysis of protein diversity in small samples
    Gutstein, Howard B.
    Morris, Jeffrey S.
    Annangudi, Suresh P.
    Sweedler, Jonathan V.
    [J]. MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS, 2008, 27 (04) : 316 - 330
  • [9] Microproteomics with microfluidic-based cell sorting: Application to 1000 and 100 immune cells
    Kasuga, Kie
    Katoh, Yasutake
    Nagase, Keisuke
    Igarashi, Kazuhiko
    [J]. PROTEOMICS, 2017, 17 (13-14)
  • [10] ONO T, 1976, Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica, V53, P199