Development and laboratory evaluation of a lateral flow device for the detection of swine vesicular disease virus in clinical samples

被引:9
作者
Ferris, Nigel P. [1 ]
Nordengrahn, Ann [2 ]
Hutchings, Geoffrey H. [1 ]
Paton, David J. [1 ]
Kristersson, Therese [2 ]
Merza, Malik [2 ]
机构
[1] AFRC, Inst Anim Hlth, Pirbright Lab, Woking GU24 0NF, Surrey, England
[2] Svanova Biotech AB, S-75183 Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
Swine vesicular disease virus; Pen-side diagnosis; Lateral flow device; ELISA; Antigen detection; Differential diagnosis; FOOT-AND-MOUTH; LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY; CHROMATOGRAPHIC STRIP TEST; RT-PCR; DIAGNOSIS; VALIDATION; ANTIBODIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.09.023
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A lateral flow device (LFD) for the detection of swine vesicular disease (SVD) virus (SVDV) and differential diagnosis from foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) was developed using a monoclonal antibody (Mab C70). The performance of the LFD was evaluated in the laboratory on suspensions of vesicular epithelia and cell culture passage derived supernatants of SVDV and porcine teschovirus (enterovirus; PEV). The collection of test samples included 157 which were positive for SVDV (84 vesicular epithelial suspensions and 73 cell culture antigens) from suspected cases of vesicular disease in pigs collected from 14 countries between 1966 and 2008 and 663 samples which were either shown to be negative for SVDV and FMD virus (FMDV) or else collected from healthy pigs or demonstrated to be positive for FMDV, PEV or vesicular exanthema (VEV) and collected from 16 countries between 1965 and 2008 or else were derived from experimental animals. Three further samples containing vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) were also tested. The diagnostic sensitivity of the LFD for SVDV was similar at 82% compared to 86% obtained by the reference method of antigen ELISA, and the diagnostic specificity was 100% compared to 99.7% for the ELISA. The device recognized virus strains of each of the known genotypes of the sole SVDV serotype. Reactions with FMDV, VEV, VSV and PEV which can produce clinically indistinguishable syndromes in pigs, did not occur. These data illustrate the potential for the LFD to be used next to the animal for providing rapid and objective support to veterinarians in their clinical judgment of vesicular disease in pigs and for the specific pen-side diagnosis of SVD and differential diagnosis from FMD. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 480
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Anderson I., 2002, Foot mouth disease 2001: lessons to be learned inquiry report
  • [2] Swine vesicular disease surveillance and eradication activities in Italy
    Bellini, S.
    Santucci, U.
    Zanardi, G.
    Brocchi, E.
    Marabelli, R.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2007, 26 (03): : 585 - 593
  • [3] BELLINI S, REV SCI TEC INP RESS
  • [4] DEVELOPMENT OF 2 NOVEL MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY-BASED ELISAS FOR THE DETECTION OF ANTIBODIES AND THE IDENTIFICATION OF SWINE ISOTYPES AGAINST SWINE VESICULAR DISEASE VIRUS
    BROCCHI, E
    BERLINZANI, A
    GAMBA, D
    DESIMONE, F
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1995, 52 (1-2) : 155 - 167
  • [5] Brocchi E., 1986, SESS RES GROUP STAND, P30
  • [6] A rapid chromatographic strip test for the pen-side diagnosis of rinderpest virus
    Brüning, A
    Bellamy, K
    Talbot, D
    Anderson, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 81 (1-2) : 143 - 154
  • [7] Buckley L. S., 1975, Bulletin de l'Office International des Epizooties, V83, P123
  • [8] Validation of a monoclonal antibody-based ELISA to detect antibodies directed against swine vesicular disease virus
    Chénard, G
    Bloemraad, M
    Kramps, JA
    Terpstra, C
    Dekker, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1998, 75 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [9] COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF UNITED-KINGDOM ISOLATES OF SWINE VESICULAR DISEASE VIRUS
    DONALDSON, AI
    FERRIS, NP
    KNOWLES, NJ
    BARNETT, ITR
    [J]. RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 1983, 35 (03) : 295 - 300
  • [10] Ferris N P, 1984, Rev Sci Tech, V3, P339, DOI 10.20506/rst.3.2.162