Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants

被引:10
|
作者
Hughes, Michelle L. [1 ]
Laurello, Sarah A. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Boys Town Natl Res Hosp, 555 North 30th St, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[2] Univ Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO USA
[3] Massachusetts Eye & Ear, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cochlear implant; Electrically evoked compound action potential; Temporal responses; Adaptation; Refractory recovery; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; RECOVERY FUNCTION; ACTION-POTENTIALS; FIBER RESPONSES; SPATIAL SPREAD; DURATION; AMPLITUDE; INTEGRATION; EXCITATION; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2017.06.004
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) have been used to examine temporal response patterns of the auditory nerve in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. ECAP responses to individual pulses in a pulse train vary across stimulation rates for individual CI users. For very slow rates, auditory neurons have ample time to discharge, recover, and respond to each pulse in the train. As the pulse rate increases, an alternating ECAP-amplitude pattern occurs. As the stimulation rate increases further, the alternating pattern eventually ceases and the overall ECAP amplitudes are diminished, yielding a relatively stochastic state that presumably reflects a combination of adaptation, desynchronization, and facilitation across fibers. Because CIs operate over a range of current levels in everyday use, it is important to understand auditory-nerve responses to pulse trains over a range of levels. The effect of stimulus level on ECAP temporal response patterns in human CI users has not been well studied. The first goal of this study was to examine the effect of stimulus level on various aspects of ECAP temporal responses to pulse-train stimuli. Because higher stimulus levels yield more synchronous responses and faster recovery, it was hypothesized that: (1) the maximum alternation would occur at slower rates for lower levels and faster rates at higher levels, (2) the alternation depth at its maximum would be smaller for lower levels, (3) the rate that produces a stochastic state ('stochastic rate') would decrease with level, (4) adaptation would be greater for lower levels as a result of slower recovery, and (5) refractory-recovery time constants would be longer (slower) for lower levels, consistent with earlier studies. The second goal of this study was to examine how refractory-recovery time constants relate specifically to maximum alternation and stochastic rate. Data were collected for 12 ears in 10 CI recipients. ECAPs were recorded in response to each of 13 pulses in an equal-amplitude pulse train ranging in rate from 900-3500 pps for three levels (low, medium, high). The results generally supported hypotheses 1-4; there were no significant effects of level on the refractory-recovery time constants (hypothesis 5). When data were pooled across level, there was a significant negative correlation between alternation depth and refractory recovery time. Understanding the effects of stimulus level on auditory-nerve responses may provide further insight into improving the use of objective measures for potentially optimizing speech-processing strategies. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 129
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What can stimulus polarity and interphase gap tell us about auditory nerve function in cochlear-implant recipients?
    Hughes, Michelle L.
    Choi, Sangsook
    Glickman, Erin
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 359 : 50 - 63
  • [22] Effect of auditory feedback on speech intelligibility of adults with cochlear implants
    Priner, R.
    Cranial, C.
    Chayat, C.
    Fraenkel, R.
    Brand, Devora
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 279 (09) : 4345 - 4351
  • [23] Effect of auditory feedback on speech intelligibility of adults with cochlear implants
    R. Priner
    C. Cranial
    C. Chayat
    R. Fraenkel
    Devora Brand
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022, 279 : 4345 - 4351
  • [24] Comparison of response properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve reported in human listeners and in animal models
    Skidmore, Jeffrey
    Ramekers, Dyan
    Bruce, Ian C.
    He, Shuman
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2022, 426
  • [25] Auditory evoked response to an oddball paradigm in children wearing cochlear implants
    Deroche, Mickael L. D.
    Wolfe, Jace
    Neumann, Sara
    Manning, Jacy
    Towler, William
    Alemi, Razieh
    Bien, Alexander G.
    Koirala, Nabin
    Hanna, Lindsay
    Henry, Lauren
    Gracco, Vincent L.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 149 : 133 - 145
  • [26] μLED-based optical cochlear implants for spectrally selective activation of the auditory nerve
    Dieter, Alexander
    Klein, Eric
    Keppeler, Daniel
    Jablonski, Lukasz
    Harczos, Tamas
    Hoch, Gerhard
    Rankovic, Vladan
    Paul, Oliver
    Jeschke, Marcus
    Ruther, Patrick
    Moser, Tobias
    EMBO MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [27] Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants
    Pfingst, BE
    Holloway, LA
    Zwolan, TA
    Collins, LM
    HEARING RESEARCH, 1999, 134 (1-2) : 105 - 115
  • [28] Environmental Sound Perception in Patients with Cochlear Implants Compared with That in Patients with Auditory Nerve Diseases (Auditory Neuropathy) and Cortical Deafness
    Kaga, Kimitaka
    Akamatsu, Yusuke
    NEUROPATHIES OF THE AUDITORY AND VESTIBULAR EIGHTH CRANIAL NERVES, 2009, : 53 - +
  • [29] Analysis of electrically evoked compound action potential of the auditory nerve in children with bilateral cochlear implants
    Caldas, Fernanda Ferreira
    Cardoso, Carolina Costa
    de Souza Chelminski Barreto, Monique Antunes
    Teixeira, Marina Santos
    da Silva Hilgenberg, Anacleia Melo
    Martins Serra, Lucieny Silva
    Bahmad Junior, Fayez
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 82 (02) : 123 - 130
  • [30] Effect of Different References on Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Children with Cochlear Implants
    Liang, Maojin
    Liu, Jiahao
    Zhang, Junpeng
    Wang, Junbo
    Chen, Yuebo
    Cai, Yuexin
    Chen, Ling
    Zheng, Yiqing
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 11