Intra- and Interobserver Variability of Cochlear Length Measurements in Clinical CT

被引:20
作者
Iyaniwura, John E. [1 ]
Elfarnawany, Mai [2 ]
Riyahi-Alam, Sadegh [2 ]
Sharma, Manas [3 ]
Kassam, Zahra [3 ]
Bureau, Yves [4 ]
Parnes, Lorne S. [2 ]
Ladak, Hanif M. [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
Agrawal, Sumit K. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Biomed Engn Grad Program, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, London, ON, Canada
[3] Western Univ, Dept Med Imaging, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Dept Med Biophys, London, ON, Canada
[5] Western Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, London, ON, Canada
关键词
A-value; Cochlear duct length; Cochlear implant; Computed tomography; Interobserver; Intraobserver; Multiplanar reconstruction; MULTIPLANAR RECONSTRUCTION; ELECTRODE INSERTION; DEPTH; STIMULATION; PREDICTORS; CORTI; ORGAN; SIZE;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000001411
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: The cochlear A-value measurement exhibits significant inter-and intraobserver variability, and its accuracy is dependent on the visualization method in clinical computed tomography (CT) images of the cochlea. Background: An accurate estimate of the cochlear duct length (CDL) can be used to determine electrode choice, and frequency map the cochlea based on the Greenwood equation. Studies have described estimating the CDL using a single A-value measurement, however the observer variability has not been assessed. Methods: Clinical and micro-CT images of 20 cadaveric cochleae were acquired. Four specialists measured A-values on clinical CT images using both standard views and multiplanar reconstructed (MPR) views. Measurements were repeated to assess for intraobserver variability. Observer variabilities were evaluated using intra-class correlation and absolute differences. Accuracy was evaluated by comparison to the gold standard micro-CT images of the same specimens. Results: Interobserver variability was good (average absolute difference: 0.77 +/- 0.42 mm) using standard views and fair (average absolute difference: 0.90 +/- 0.31 mm) using MPR views. Intraobserver variability had an average absolute difference of 0.31 +/- 0.09mm for the standard views and 0.38 +/- 0.17 mm for the MPR views. MPR view measurements were more accurate than standard views, with average relative errors of 9.5 and 14.5%, respectively. Conclusion: There was significant observer variability in A-value measurements using both the standard and MPR views. Creating the MPR views increased variability between experts, however MPR views yielded more accurate results. Automated A-value measurement algorithms may help to reduce variability and increase accuracy in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:828 / 832
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Alexiades G, 2015, OTOL NEUROTOL, V36, P904, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000620
[2]   Liver and Spleen Stiffness Measurements by Point Shear Wave Elastography via Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Intraobserver and Interobserver Variability and Predictors of Variability in a US Population [J].
Balakrishnan, Maya ;
Souza, Fernanda ;
Munoz, Carolina ;
Augustin, Salvador ;
Loo, Nicole ;
Deng, Yanhong ;
Ciarleglio, Maria ;
Garcia-Tsao, Guadalupe .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (11) :2373-2380
[3]  
Cicchetti DV., 1994, PSYCHOL ASSESSMENTS, V6, P284, DOI [10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284, DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284]
[4]   Variational Anatomy of the Human Cochlea: Implications for Cochlear Implantation [J].
Erixon, Elsa ;
Hogstorp, Herman ;
Wadin, Karin ;
Rask-Andersen, Helge .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2009, 30 (01) :14-22
[5]  
Escude Bernard, 2006, Audiol Neurootol, V11 Suppl 1, P27, DOI 10.1159/000095611
[6]   PRACTICAL CONE-BEAM ALGORITHM [J].
FELDKAMP, LA ;
DAVIS, LC ;
KRESS, JW .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1984, 1 (06) :612-619
[7]   A COCHLEAR FREQUENCY-POSITION FUNCTION FOR SEVERAL SPECIES - 29 YEARS LATER [J].
GREENWOOD, DD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1990, 87 (06) :2592-2605
[8]   The length of the organ of Corti in man [J].
Hardy, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ANATOMY, 1938, 62 (02) :291-311
[9]   Deep electrode insertion and sound coding in cochlear implants [J].
Hochmair, Ingeborg ;
Hochmair, Erwin ;
Nopp, Peter ;
Waller, Melissa ;
Jolly, Claude .
HEARING RESEARCH, 2015, 322 :14-23
[10]  
Jiam NT, 2016, OTOL NEUROTOL, V37, P672, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001060