Patient, surgeon, and hospital disparities associated with benign hysterectomy approach and perioperative complications

被引:101
作者
Mehta, Ambar [1 ]
Xu, Tim [1 ]
Hutfless, Susan [2 ]
Makary, Martin A. [3 ]
Sinno, Abdulrahman K. [4 ]
Tanner, Edward J., III [4 ]
Stone, Rebecca L. [4 ]
Wang, Karen [5 ]
Fader, Amanda N. [4 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Med, Kelly Gynecol Oncol Serv, Baltimore, MD 21231 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Med, Div Gynecol Specialties, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
benign indication; complications; hysterectomy; minimally-invasive; surgeon volume; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; HIGH-VOLUME HOSPITALS; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; MORTALITY; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.020
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Hysterectomy is among the most common major surgical procedures performed in women. Approximately 450,000 hysterectomy procedures are performed each year in the United States for benign indications. However, little is known regarding contemporary US hysterectomy trends for women with benign disease with respect to operative technique and perioperative complications, and the association between these 2 factors with patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe contemporary hysterectomy trends and explore associations between patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics with surgical approach and perioperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Hysterectomies performed for benign indications by general gynecologists from July 2012 through September 2014 were analyzed in the all-payer Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission database. We excluded hysterectomies performed by gynecologic oncologists, reproductive endocrinologists, and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgeons. We included both open hysterectomies and those performed by minimally invasive surgery, which included vaginal hysterectomies. Perioperative complications were defined using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators. Surgeon hysterectomy volume during the 2-year study period was analyzed (0-5 cases annually = very low, 6-10 = low, 11-20 = medium, and >= 21 = high). We utilized logistic regression and negative binomial regression to identify patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics associated with minimally invasive surgery utilization and perioperative complications, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 5660 hospitalizations were identified during the study period. Most patients (61.5%) had an open hysterectomy; 38.5% underwent a minimally invasive surgery procedure (25.1% robotic, 46.6% laparoscopic, 28.3% vaginal). Most surgeons (68.2%) were very lowe or low-volume surgeons. Factors associated with a lower likelihood of undergoing minimally invasive surgery included older patient age (reference 45-64 years; 20-44 years: adjusted odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.28), black race (reference white; adjusted odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.78), Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.80), smaller hospital (reference large; small: adjusted odds ratio, 0.26; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.45; medium: adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.96), medium hospital hysterectomy volume (reference =200 hysterectomies; 100-200: adjusted odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.87), and medium vs high surgeon volume (reference high; medium: adjusted odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.97). Complications occurred in 25.8% of open and 8.2% of minimally invasive hysterectomies (P < .0001). Minimally invasive hysterectomy (adjusted odds ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.27) and large hysterectomy volume hospitals (reference >= 200 hysterectomies; 1-100: adjusted odds ratio, 2.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.60-3.20; 101-200: adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-2.16) were associated with fewer complications, while patient payer, including Medicare (reference private; adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-2.61), Medicaid (adjusted odds ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.04), and self-pay status (adjusted odds ratio, 2.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-4.12), and very-low and low surgeon hysterectomy volume (reference >= 21 cases; 1-5 cases: adjusted odds ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-2.47; 6-10 cases: adjusted odds ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-2.23) were associated with perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: Use of minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign indications remains variable, with most patients undergoing open, more morbid procedures. Older and black patients and smaller hospitals are associated with open hysterectomy. Patient race and payer status, hysterectomy approach, and surgeon volume were associated with perioperative complications. Hysterectomies performed for benign indications by high-volume surgeons or by minimally invasive techniques may represent an opportunity to reduce preventable harm.
引用
收藏
页码:497.e1 / 497.e10
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, PAT SAF IND OV
[2]  
Aimaq R, 2011, AM SURGEON, V77, P1290
[3]  
[Anonymous], JSLS
[4]   Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Stukel, TA ;
Siewers, AE ;
Goodney, PP ;
Wennberg, DE ;
Lucas, FL .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (22) :2117-2127
[5]   Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review [J].
Cooper, Michol A. ;
Hutfless, Susan ;
Segev, Dorry L. ;
Ibrahim, Andrew ;
Lyu, Heather ;
Makary, Martin A. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 349
[6]   Factors Associated With 30-Day Hospital Readmission After Hysterectomy [J].
Dessources, Kimberly ;
Hou, June Y. ;
Tergas, Ana I. ;
Burke, William M. ;
Ananth, Cande V. ;
Prendergast, Eri ;
Chen, Ling ;
Neugut, Alfred I. ;
Hershman, Dawn L. ;
Wright, Jason D. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 (02) :461-470
[7]   Surgeon Volume and Outcomes in Benign Hysterectomy [J].
Doll, Kemi M. ;
Milad, Magdy P. ;
Gossett, Dana R. .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (05) :554-561
[8]   Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data [J].
Elixhauser, A ;
Steiner, C ;
Harris, DR ;
Coffey, RN .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :8-27
[9]   Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Endometrial Cancer Care A Quality and Cost Disparity [J].
Fader, Amanda N. ;
Weise, R. Matsuno ;
Sinno, Abdulrahman K. ;
Tanner, Edward J., III ;
Borah, Bijan J. ;
Moriarty, James P. ;
Bristow, Robert E. ;
Makary, Martin A. ;
Pronovost, Peter J. ;
Hutfless, Susan ;
Dowdy, Sean C. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 127 (01) :91-100
[10]   Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer [J].
Galaal, Khadra ;
Bryant, Andrew ;
Fisher, Ann D. ;
Al-Khaduri, Maha ;
Kew, Fiona ;
Lopes, Alberto D. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (09)