Cabergoline versus calcium infusion in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomised controlled study

被引:9
作者
Fouda, Usama M. [1 ]
Elshaer, Hesham S. [1 ,3 ]
Youssef, Gamal G. [1 ]
Hanafy, Amal [1 ]
Mehrem, Waleed M. [2 ]
Youssef, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Farouk, Mona [1 ]
Nabil, Hala [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Al Gazeera Hosp, Assisted Concept Unit, Giza, Egypt
[3] Riyadh Fertil & Reprod Hlth Ctr, Giza, Egypt
关键词
Cabergoline; OHSS; calcium gluconate; IVF-ET; EMBRYO CRYOPRESERVATION; HIGH-RISK; IVF; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1080/01443615.2020.1870944
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of calcium infusion versus cabergoline in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in IVF patients at high risk for OHSS. One hundred and seventy patients who were stimulated using the long luteal GnRH agonist protocol and at high risk for developing OHSS were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to cabergoline group and calcium gluconate group. In cabergoline group, 0.5 mg of cabergoline was administered once daily p.o. for eight days starting on the day of HCG administration. In calcium gluconate group, intravenous calcium gluconate (10%, 10 ml in 200 ml of physiologic saline) was administered daily for four days starting on the day of ovum pickup. Six patients in cabergoline group and eight patients in calcium gluconate group developed moderate OHSS. One patient in each group developed severe OHSS. The incidence of moderate/severe OHSS was comparable between both groups (8.24% vs. 10.59%, p value = .599, OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.269-2.138]). The implantation, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were similar in the two groups (16.91% vs. 15.84%, p = .771, 35.29% vs. 32.94%, p = .746, and 30.59% vs. 28.24%, p = .736, respectively). In conclusion, calcium infusion and cabergoline have comparable effectiveness in the prevention of OHSS. Both drugs are well tolerated, cheap and have no adverse effects on the reproductive outcomes of IVF cycle. What is already known on this subject? The effectiveness of cabergoline in the prevention of OHSS in IVF patients at high risk for OHSS is confirmed by overwhelming scientific evidence. Calcium infusion is a novel strategy for prevention of OHSS. Few studies reported the use of calcium infusion in the prevention of OHSS. A retrospective study and a randomised controlled study revealed that calcium infusion reduces the incidence of OHSS. Moreover, a quasi-randomised study revealed that calcium infusion is as effective as cabergoline in the prevention of OHSS. What the results of this study add? Calcium infusion and cabergoline have comparable effectiveness in the prevention of OHSS. Both drugs are well tolerated, cheap and have no adverse effects on the reproductive outcomes of IVF cycle. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Calcium infusion should be used to minimise the incidence of OHSS in IVF patients at high risk for OHSS.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 126
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High dose cabergoline in management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
    Ata, Baris
    Seyhan, Ayse
    Orhaner, Serbulent
    Urman, Bulent
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (03) : 1168.e1 - 1168.e4
  • [22] Cabergoline reduces the early onset of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized study
    Carizza, Carlos
    Abdelmassih, Vicente
    Abdelmassih, Soraya
    Ravizzini, Pedro
    Salgueiro, Lister
    Salgueiro, Paulo Tudech
    Jine, Lin Tao
    Nagy, Peter
    Abdelmassih, Roger
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2008, 17 (06) : 751 - 755
  • [23] Cabergoline vs intravenous albumin or combination of both for prevention of the early onset ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
    Soliman, Badeea
    MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2011, 16 (01) : 56 - 60
  • [24] Laparoscopic ovarian drilling versus GnRH antagonist combined with cabergoline as a prophylaxis against the re-development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome
    Seyam, Emaduldin
    Hefzy, Enas
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 34 (07) : 616 - 622
  • [25] Comparison of montelukast and cabergoline for prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: in an experimental rat model
    Akman, Levent
    Sahin, Gulnaz
    Erbas, Oytun
    Aktug, Huseyin
    Akdogan, Aysin
    Goker, Ege Nazan Tavmergen
    Taskiran, Dilek
    Tavmergen, Erol
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2015, 31 (05) : 369 - 373
  • [26] Cabergoline versus Coasting in the Prevention of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome and Assisted Reproductive Technologies Outcome in High Risk Patients
    Sohrabvand, Farnaz
    Ansaripour, Soheila
    Bagheri, Maryam
    Shariat, Mamak
    Jafarabadi, Mina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FERTILITY & STERILITY, 2009, 3 (01) : 35 - 40
  • [27] Comparison of cabergoline and intravenous albumin in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
    Tehraninejad, Ensieh Shahrokh
    Hafezi, Maryam
    Arabipoor, Arezoo
    Aziminekoo, Elham
    Chehrazi, Mohammad
    Bahmanabadi, Akram
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2012, 29 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [28] Comparison of cabergoline and intravenous albumin in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
    Ensieh Shahrokh Tehraninejad
    Maryam Hafezi
    Arezoo Arabipoor
    Elham Aziminekoo
    Mohammad Chehrazi
    Akram Bahmanabadi
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2012, 29 : 259 - 264
  • [29] Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: pathophysiology and prevention
    Nastri, Carolina O.
    Ferriani, Rui A.
    Rocha, Isa A.
    Martins, Wellington P.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2010, 27 (2-3) : 121 - 128
  • [30] Methylprednisolone for prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome undergoing in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised controlled trial
    Yeganeh, Ladan Mohammadi
    Moini, Ashraf
    Shiva, Marzieh
    Mirghavam, Naimeh
    Lankarani, Narges Bagheri
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2018, 38 (02) : 241 - 246