Differences in lumbar dural sac dimension in supine and lateral positions in late pregnancy: a magnetic resonance imaging study

被引:2
作者
Xu, Fei [1 ]
Liu, Ying [2 ]
Wei, Yuan [3 ]
Zhao, Yangyu [3 ]
Yuan, Huishu [2 ]
Guo, Xiangyang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Hosp 3, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Epidural venous plexus; Obstetric; Positional change; CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID PROGESTERONE; BUPIVACAINE SPINAL-ANESTHESIA; PLAIN BUPIVACAINE; NONPREGNANT WOMEN; CESAREAN-SECTION; VENOUS PLEXUS; SPREAD; VOLUME; NERVE; INJECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.09.008
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: This study was designed to quantitatively investigate differences in lumbar dural sac dimensions between the lateral and supine positions in late pregnancy. Methods: Ten healthy volunteers with singleton pregnancies at 28-39 weeks of gestation were included. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in random order while subjects were in the left lateral and supine positions. Lumbosacral axial scans were obtained at the L1-2, L2-3, L3-4, L4-5 and L5-S1 intervertebral disc levels. The axial section area, anteroposterior maximum diameter and transversal maximum diameter of the dural sac were measured and differences between these parameters in the lateral and supine positions were compared. Results: The axial section areas of the dural sac at L1-2 (P<0.001), L2-3 (P=0.001), L3-4 (P<0.001) and L4-5 (P=0.005) and the transversal maximum diameter of the dural sac at L1-2 (P<0.001), L2-3 (P<0.001), L3-4 (P<0.001) and L4-5 (P=0.001) were greater in the lateral position compared with the supine position. The anteroposterior maximum diameter of the dural sac at L4-5 was greater in the lateral position compared with the supine position (P=0.019) but there were no significant differences at other levels. The magnitude of the differences in axial section area and transverse maximal diameter were similar among the levels studied. Conclusions: The axial section area and the transversal maximum diameter of the dural sac in the lumbar area are reduced in the supine compared with the lateral position in late pregnancy. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 23
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Benefits and risks of MRI in pregnancy.
    Bulas, Dorothy
    Egloff, Alexia
    [J]. SEMINARS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2013, 37 (05) : 301 - 304
  • [2] PREGNANCY INCREASES MEDIAN NERVE SUSCEPTIBILITY TO LIDOCAINE
    BUTTERWORTH, JF
    WALKER, FO
    LYSAK, SZ
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 72 (06) : 962 - 965
  • [3] DATTA S, 1986, ANESTH ANALG, V65, P950
  • [4] DATTA S, 1983, ANESTH ANALG, V62, P1070
  • [5] FLANAGAN HL, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P123
  • [6] The effect of posture and baricity on the spread of intrathecal bupivacaine for elective Cesarean delivery
    Hallworth, SP
    Fernando, R
    Columb, MO
    Stocks, GM
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (04) : 1159 - 1165
  • [7] The influence of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid volume on extent and duration of hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia: A comparison between seated and lateral decubitus injection positions
    Higuchi, H
    Adachi, Y
    Kazama, T
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (02) : 555 - 560
  • [8] Influence of lumbosacral cerebrospinal fluid density, velocity, and volume on extent and duration of plain bupivacaine spinal anesthesia
    Higuchi, H
    Hirata, J
    Adachi, Y
    Kazama, T
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 100 (01) : 106 - 114
  • [9] ANATOMICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE SPINAL COLUMN IN THE SUPINE POSITION .2. COMPARISON OF PREGNANT AND NONPREGNANT WOMEN
    HIRABAYASHI, Y
    SHIMIZU, R
    FUKUDA, H
    SAITOH, K
    FURUSE, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 75 (01) : 6 - 8
  • [10] SPREAD OF SUBARACHNOID HYPERBARIC AMETHOCAINE IN PREGNANT-WOMEN
    HIRABAYASHI, Y
    SHIMIZU, R
    SAITOH, K
    FUKUDA, H
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 74 (04) : 384 - 386