The making of the corporate carbon footprint: the politics behind emission scoping

被引:13
作者
Walenta, Jayme [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Geog & Environm, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Carbon footprint; corporations; climate responsibility; carbon accounting; boundaries; CLIMATE; ORGANIZATIONS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1080/17530350.2021.1935297
中图分类号
G [文化、科学、教育、体育]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 04 ;
摘要
The key measurement standard used by the private sector to measure the carbon emission impact of an organization is the corporate carbon footprint. Known as the GHG Protocol, this standard was created in 2001 through a multi-stakeholder collaboration and is now used by thousands of companies globally. This article discusses the origins of the Protocol to better illuminate the politics surrounding the counting and measuring of carbon emissions as environmental intangibles that serve as a critical first step towards corporate climate action. Using archival research and interviews with key stakeholders, I underscore the actors involved and their motivations, which combined led to the development of certain internal accounting technologies, namely the practice of scoping. Scoping was proposed as a way to categorize emissions according to levels of legal ownership and control and avoid 'double-counting'. Using Chiapello and Engels' suggesting that integrating scoping was an effort to forge a compatibility between economic growth and climate protection and protect the financial interests of businesses by narrowly enclosing climate mitigation responsibility. To conclude, I discuss the lasting implications to measuring carbon with the corporate carbon footprint for meaningful climate action.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 548
页数:16
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Consumption-based carbon accounting: does it have a future? [J].
Afionis, Stavros ;
Sakai, Marco ;
Scott, Kate ;
Barrett, John ;
Gouldson, Andy .
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 8 (01)
[2]  
Aguiton, 2021, J CULTURAL EC SPECIA
[3]  
[Anonymous], Our Approach
[4]   As frames collide: making sense of carbon accounting [J].
Ascui, Francisco ;
Lovell, Heather .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2011, 24 (08) :978-999
[5]  
Barral, 2021, J CULTURAL EC SPECIA
[6]   Fossil fuel reserves and resources reporting and unburnable carbon: Investigating conflicting accounts [J].
Bebbington, Jan ;
Schneider, Thomas ;
Stevenson, Lorna ;
Fox, Alison .
CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, 2020, 66
[7]   Counting Carbon: Calculative Activism and Slippery Infrastructure [J].
Beuret, Nicholas .
ANTIPODE, 2017, 49 (05) :1164-1185
[8]   Standardization Cycles: A Process Perspective on the Formation and Diffusion of Transnational Standards [J].
Botzem, Sebastian ;
Dobusch, Leonhard .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2012, 33 (5-6) :737-762
[9]   Carbon accounting Emerald Negotiating accuracy, consistency and certainty across organisational fields [J].
Bowen, Frances ;
Wittneben, Bettina .
ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL, 2011, 24 (08) :1022-1036
[10]   Creative accounting: A critical perspective on the market-based method for reporting purchased electricity (scope 2) emissions [J].
Brander, Matthew ;
Gillenwater, Michael ;
Ascui, Francisco .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 112 :29-33