Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity

被引:1347
作者
Thomsen, Philip Francis [1 ]
Willerslev, Eske [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Ctr GeoGenet, Nat Hist Museum Denmark, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Environmental DNA; eDNA; DNA metabarcoding; Conservation; Biodiversity; Monitoring; Extinction; EXTRACELLULAR DNA; ANCIENT DNA; LAKE-SEDIMENTS; DEEP-SEA; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; FUNGAL COMMUNITIES; ARCTIC VEGETATION; SPECIES DETECTION; EDNA; PCR;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The continuous decline in Earth's biodiversity represents a major crisis and challenge for the 21st century, and there is international political agreement to slow down or halt this decline. The challenge is in large part impeded by the lack of knowledge on the state and distribution of biodiversity - especially since the majority of species on Earth are un-described by science. All conservation efforts to save biodiversity essentially depend on the monitoring of species and populations to obtain reliable distribution patterns and population size estimates. Such monitoring has traditionally relied on physical identification of species by visual surveys and counting of individuals. However, traditional monitoring techniques remain problematic due to difficulties associated with correct identification of cryptic species or juvenile life stages, a continuous decline in taxonomic expertise, non-standardized sampling, and the invasive nature of some survey techniques. Hence, there is urgent need for alternative and efficient techniques for large-scale biodiversity monitoring. Environmental DNA (eDNA) - defined here as: genetic material obtained directly from environmental samples (soil, sediment, water, etc.) without any obvious signs of biological source material - is an efficient, non-invasive and easy-to-standardize sampling approach. Coupled with sensitive, cost-efficient and ever-advancing DNA sequencing technology, it may be an appropriate candidate for the challenge of biodiversity monitoring. Environmental DNA has been obtained from ancient as well as modern samples and encompasses single species detection to analyses of ecosystems. The research on eDNA initiated in microbiology, recognizing that culture-based methods grossly misrepresent the microbial diversity in nature. Subsequently, as a method to assess the diversity of macro-organismal communities, eDNA was first analyzed in sediments, revealing DNA from extinct and extant animals and plants, but has since been obtained from various terrestrial and aquatic environmental samples. Results from eDNA approaches have provided valuable insights to the study of ancient environments and proven useful for monitoring contemporary biodiversity in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. In the future, we expect the eDNA-based approaches to move from single-marker analyses of species or communities to meta-genomic surveys of entire ecosystems to predict spatial and temporal biodiversity patterns. Such advances have applications for a range of biological, geological and environmental sciences. Here we review the achievements gained through analyses of eDNA from macro-organisms in a conservation context, and discuss its potential advantages and limitations for biodiversity monitoring. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 18
页数:15
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]   PCR-induced sequence artifacts and bias: Insights from comparison of two 16S rRNA clone libraries constructed from the same sample [J].
Acinas, SG ;
Sarma-Rupavtarm, R ;
Klepac-Ceraj, V ;
Polz, MF .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (12) :8966-8969
[2]   Meta-barcoding of 'dirt' DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity [J].
Andersen, Kenneth ;
Bird, Karen Lise ;
Rasmussen, Morten ;
Haile, James ;
Breuning-Madsen, Henrik ;
Kjaer, Kurt H. ;
Orlando, Ludovic ;
Gilbert, M. Thomas P. ;
Willerslev, Eske .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2012, 21 (08) :1966-1979
[3]   Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities: increased understanding through the application of molecular techniques [J].
Anderson, IC ;
Cairney, JWG .
ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 6 (08) :769-779
[4]   Ancient DNA from lake sediments: Bridging the gap between paleoecology and genetics [J].
Anderson-Carpenter, Lynn L. ;
McLachlan, Jason S. ;
Jackson, Stephen T. ;
Kuch, Melanie ;
Lumibao, Candice Y. ;
Poinar, Hendrik N. .
BMC EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2011, 11
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, INT J ZOOL, DOI DOI 10.1155/2013/174056
[6]  
Awano T, 2009, P NATL ACAD SCI USA, V106, P2794, DOI [10.1073/pnas.0812297106, 10.1073/pnas.0905845106]
[7]   Biomonitoring 2.0: a new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next-generation DNA sequencing [J].
Baird, Donald J. ;
Hajibabaei, Mehrdad .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2012, 21 (08) :2039-2044
[8]  
Baldwin CC., 1996, METHODS TECHNIQUES U, P11
[9]   Environmental Conditions Influence eDNA Persistence in Aquatic Systems [J].
Barnes, Matthew A. ;
Turner, Cameron R. ;
Jerde, Christopher L. ;
Renshaw, Mark A. ;
Chadderton, W. Lindsay ;
Lodge, David M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (03) :1819-1827
[10]   Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived? [J].
Barnosky, Anthony D. ;
Matzke, Nicholas ;
Tomiya, Susumu ;
Wogan, Guinevere O. U. ;
Swartz, Brian ;
Quental, Tiago B. ;
Marshall, Charles ;
McGuire, Jenny L. ;
Lindsey, Emily L. ;
Maguire, Kaitlin C. ;
Mersey, Ben ;
Ferrer, Elizabeth A. .
NATURE, 2011, 471 (7336) :51-57