Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry

被引:200
|
作者
Esenduran, Gokce [1 ]
Kemahlioglu-Ziya, Eda [2 ]
Swaminathan, Jayashankar M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Fisher Coll Business, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] NC State Univ, Poole Coll Management, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
environmental regulation; competition; game theory; public policy; DOWNSTREAM WASTE-DISPOSAL; SUPPLY CHAIN; PRODUCT; LEGISLATION; COMPETITION; RECOVERY; DESIGN; RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/poms.12673
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As waste from used electronic products grows steadily, manufacturers face take-back regulations mandating its collection and proper treatment through recycling, or remanufacturing. Environmentalists greet such regulation with enthusiasm, but its effect on remanufacturing activity and industry competition remains unclear. We research these questions, using a stylized model with an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) facing competition from an independent remanufacturer (IR). We examine the effects of regulation on three key factors: remanufacturing levels, consumer surplus, and the OEM profit. First, we find that total OEM remanufacturing actually may decrease under high collection and/or reuse targets, meaning more stringent targets do not imply more remanufacturing. Consumer surplus and the OEM profit, meanwhile, may increase when OEM-IR competition exists in a regulated market. Finally, through a numerical study, we investigate how total welfare changes in the collection target, what happens when the cost of collection is not linear, and what happens when IR products are valued differently by consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 944
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of Market Competition on Remanufacturing Investment
    Zhou, Qin
    Meng, Chao
    Sheu, Jiuh-Biing
    Yuen, Kum Fai
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2023, 71 : 6995 - 7014
  • [32] VARYING LIFECYCLE LENGTHS WITHIN A PORTFOLIO FOR PRODUCT TAKE-BACK
    Zhao, Yuan
    Pandey, Vijitashwa
    Kim, Harrison
    Thurston, Deborah
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOL 8, PTS A AND B, 2010, : 323 - 335
  • [33] Impact of Subsidy Policy on Remanufacturing Industry's Donation Strategy
    Chen, Xintong
    Li, Zonghuo
    Wang, Junjin
    PROCESSES, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [34] Modeling and assessment of e-waste take-back strategies in India
    Dwivedy, Maheshwar
    Suchde, Pratik
    Mittal, R. K.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2015, 96 : 11 - 18
  • [35] Managing Supplier-Manufacturer Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Product Design and Take-Back Legislation
    Wang, Yue
    Xin, Baoying
    Wang, Zhe
    Li, Bangyi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (04)
  • [36] Quantification of ongoing community-based medication take-back program
    Perry, Laura A.
    Shinn, Bradley W.
    Stanovich, John
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 54 (03) : 275 - 279
  • [37] Strategic take-back programs when consumers have heterogeneous environmental preferences
    Forlin, Valeria
    Scholz, Eva-Maria
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 60
  • [38] Optimal Consumer Electronics Product Take-Back Time with Consideration of Consumer Value
    Fang, Yi-Tse
    Rau, Hsin
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (03):
  • [39] Changeable closed-loop manufacturing systems: challenges in product take-back and evaluation of reconfigurable solutions
    Andersen, Ann-Louise
    Brunoe, Thomas D.
    Bockholt, Markus Thomas
    Napoleone, Alessia
    Kristensen, Jesper Hemdrup
    Colli, Michele
    Waehrens, Brian Vejrum
    Nielsen, Kjeld
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2023, 61 (03) : 839 - 858
  • [40] An Operations Perspective on Product Take-Back Legislation for E-Waste: Theory, Practice, and Research Needs
    Atasu, Atalay
    Van Wassenhove, Luk N.
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2012, 21 (03) : 407 - 422