Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry

被引:200
|
作者
Esenduran, Gokce [1 ]
Kemahlioglu-Ziya, Eda [2 ]
Swaminathan, Jayashankar M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Fisher Coll Business, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] NC State Univ, Poole Coll Management, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
environmental regulation; competition; game theory; public policy; DOWNSTREAM WASTE-DISPOSAL; SUPPLY CHAIN; PRODUCT; LEGISLATION; COMPETITION; RECOVERY; DESIGN; RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENT; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1111/poms.12673
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
As waste from used electronic products grows steadily, manufacturers face take-back regulations mandating its collection and proper treatment through recycling, or remanufacturing. Environmentalists greet such regulation with enthusiasm, but its effect on remanufacturing activity and industry competition remains unclear. We research these questions, using a stylized model with an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) facing competition from an independent remanufacturer (IR). We examine the effects of regulation on three key factors: remanufacturing levels, consumer surplus, and the OEM profit. First, we find that total OEM remanufacturing actually may decrease under high collection and/or reuse targets, meaning more stringent targets do not imply more remanufacturing. Consumer surplus and the OEM profit, meanwhile, may increase when OEM-IR competition exists in a regulated market. Finally, through a numerical study, we investigate how total welfare changes in the collection target, what happens when the cost of collection is not linear, and what happens when IR products are valued differently by consumers.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 944
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] On the joint dynamics of the economic and environmental performances for collective take-back systems
    Chen, Wenyi
    Kucukyazici, Beste
    Jesus Saenz, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2019, 218 : 228 - 244
  • [22] Unused medicine take-back programmes: a systematic review
    Wang, Leong Seng
    Aziz, Zoriah
    Wang, Ee Syuen
    Chik, Zamri
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 17 (01)
  • [23] Impact of government subsidy on the remanufacturing industry
    Qiao, Haike
    Su, Qin
    WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 120 : 433 - 447
  • [24] Consequence analysis for integrating remanufactured products for social donation (RSD) under mandatory take-back regulation
    Liu, Wenping
    Li, Bangyi
    Wang, Zhe
    Wang, Qixiang
    Chen, Yuyu
    Cheng, Yongbo
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 171
  • [25] Comparison of three E-Waste take-back policies
    Shan, Feifei
    Xiao, Wenli
    Yang, Feng
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2021, 242
  • [26] Varying Lifecycle Lengths Within a Product Take-Back Portfolio
    Zhao, Yuan
    Pandey, Vijitashwa
    Kim, Harrison
    Thurston, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2010, 132 (09) : 0910121 - 09101210
  • [27] An Analysis of Monopolistic and Competitive Take-Back Schemes for WEEE Recycling
    Toyasaki, Fuminori
    Boyaci, Tamer
    Verter, Vedat
    PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2011, 20 (06) : 805 - 823
  • [28] EFFECTS OF TAKE-BACK LEGISLATION ON PRICING AND COORDINATION IN A CLOSED-LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN
    Zheng, Benrong
    Hong, Xianpei
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION, 2022, 18 (03) : 1603 - 1627
  • [29] Remanufacturing in industry: advices from the field
    D'Adamo, Idiano
    Rosa, Paolo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 86 (9-12) : 2575 - 2584
  • [30] Harmonisation of Pharmaceutical Take-Back Systems in the EU
    Mitkidis, Katerina
    Obolevich, Viktoria
    Chrysochou, Polymeros
    Mitkidis, Panagiotis
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH LAW, 2021, 28 (05) : 445 - 471