The impact of noise and topology on opinion dynamics in social networks

被引:14
作者
Stern, Samuel [1 ]
Livan, Giacomo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Comp Sci, Gower St, London WC1E 6EA, England
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Syst Risk Ctr, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
opinion dynamics; network science; social networks; DIVERSITY; POLARIZATION; DIFFERENCE; UNIQUENESS; LEADERS; US;
D O I
10.1098/rsos.201943
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We investigate the impact of noise and topology on opinion diversity in social networks. We do so by extending well-established models of opinion dynamics to a stochastic setting where agents are subject both to assimilative forces by their local social interactions, as well as to idiosyncratic factors preventing their population from reaching consensus. We model the latter to account for both scenarios where noise is entirely exogenous to peer influence and cases where it is instead endogenous, arising from the agents' desire to maintain some uniqueness in their opinions. We derive a general analytical expression for opinion diversity, which holds for any network and depends on the network's topology through its spectral properties alone. Using this expression, we find that opinion diversity decreases as communities and clusters are broken down. We test our predictions against data describing empirical influence networks between major news outlets and find that incorporating our measure in linear models for the sentiment expressed by such sources on a variety of topics yields a notable improvement in terms of explanatory power.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Opinion Fluctuations and Disagreement in Social Networks [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Como, Giacomo ;
Fagnani, Fabio ;
Ozdaglar, Asuman .
MATHEMATICS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2013, 38 (01) :1-27
[2]   Recent Advances in the Modelling and Analysis of Opinion Dynamics on Influence Networks [J].
Anderson, Brian D. O. ;
Ye, Mengbin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING, 2019, 16 (02) :129-149
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, 5 INT AAAI C WEBL SO
[4]   Emergence of scaling in random networks [J].
Barabási, AL ;
Albert, R .
SCIENCE, 1999, 286 (5439) :509-512
[5]  
Barranco O., 2019, Qual Quant, V53, P599, DOI [10.1007/s10460-023-10502-x, DOI 10.1007/S10460-023-10502-X, 10.1007/s11135-018-0777-7, DOI 10.1007/S11135-018-0777-7]
[6]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[8]   Encountering "Difference'' in the Contemporary Public Sphere: The Contribution of the Internet to the Heterogeneity of Political Discussion Networks [J].
Brundidge, Jennifer .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2010, 60 (04) :680-700
[9]   Uniqueness and status consumption in Generation Y consumers Does moderation exist? [J].
Butcher, Luke ;
Phau, Ian ;
Shimul, Anwar Sadat .
MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2017, 35 (05) :673-687
[10]   Quantifying and Minimizing Risk of Conflict in Social Networks [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Lijffijt, Jefrey ;
De Bie, Tijl .
KDD'18: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 24TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2018, :1197-1205