3D Path Planning Method for Multi-UAVs Inspired by Grey Wolf Algorithms

被引:32
作者
Kiani, Farzad [1 ]
Seyyedabbasi, Amir [2 ]
Aliyev, Royal [3 ]
Shah, Mohammed Ahmed [4 ]
Gulle, Murat Ugur [3 ]
机构
[1] Istinye Univ, Software Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Beykent Univ, Comp Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Istanbul Aydin Univ, Comp Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Istanbul Ayvansaray Univ, Comp Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkey
来源
JOURNAL OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY | 2021年 / 22卷 / 04期
关键词
Path planning; Multiple UAV; Mobile robots; Metaheuristics; NAVIGATION; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.53106/160792642021072204003
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Efficient and collision-free pathfinding, between source and destination locations for multi-Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), in a predefined environment is an important topic in 3D Path planning methods. Since path planning is a Non-deterministic Polynomial-time (NP-hard) problem, metaheuristic approaches can be applied to find a suitable solution. In this study, two efficient 3D path planning methods, which are inspired by Incremental Grey Wolf Optimization (I-GWO) and Expanded Grey Wolf Optimization (Ex-GWO), are proposed to solve the problem of determining the optimal path for UAVs with minimum cost and low execution time. The proposed methods have been simulated using two different maps with three UAVs with diverse sets of starting and ending points. The proposed methods have been analyzed in three parameters (optimal path costs, time and complexity, and convergence curve) by varying population sizes as well as iteration numbers. They are compared with well-known different variations of grey wolf algorithms (GWO, mGWO, EGWO, and RWGWO). According to path cost results of the defined case studies in this study, the I-GWO-based proposed path planning method (PPI-GWO) outperformed the best with %36.11. In the other analysis parameters, this method also achieved the highest success compared to the other five methods.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 755
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Reliable M2M/IoT data delivery from FANETs via satellite [J].
Bacco, Manlio ;
Colucci, Marco ;
Gotta, Alberto ;
Kourogiorgas, Charilaos ;
Panagopoulos, Athanasios D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2019, 37 (04) :331-342
[2]   A Cooperative Driving Strategy Based on Velocity Prediction for Connected Vehicles With Robust Path-Following Control [J].
Chen, Yimin ;
Lu, Chao ;
Chu, Wenbo .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2020, 7 (05) :3822-3832
[3]   ETC Intelligent Navigation Path Planning Method [J].
Cheng, Jieren ;
Liu, Boyi ;
Cai, Kuanqi ;
Tang, Xiangyan ;
Zhang, Boyun .
JOURNAL OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 19 (02) :619-631
[4]   Intelligent Charging Path Planning for IoT Network Over Blockchain-Based Edge Architecture [J].
Cho, Hsin-Hung ;
Wu, Hsin-Te ;
Lai, Chin-Feng ;
Shih, Timothy K. ;
Tseng, Fan-Hsun .
IEEE INTERNET OF THINGS JOURNAL, 2021, 8 (04) :2379-2394
[5]   Three dimensional path planning using Grey wolf optimizer for UAVs [J].
Dewangan, Ram Kishan ;
Shukla, Anupam ;
Godfrey, W. Wilfred .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 49 (06) :2201-2217
[6]   A novel Random Walk Grey Wolf Optimizer [J].
Gupta, Shubham ;
Deep, Kusum .
SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2019, 44 :101-112
[7]   Robotic autonomous systems for earthmoving in military applications [J].
Ha, Q. P. ;
Yen, L. ;
Balaguer, C. .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2019, 107
[8]   An efficient approach to 3D path planning [J].
Han, Jihee .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2019, 478 :318-330
[9]   Enhanced Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Global Optimization [J].
Joshi, Himani ;
Arora, Sankalap .
FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2017, 153 (03) :235-264
[10]  
KIANI F, 2013, LIFE SCI J, V10, P39