Predicting Academic Success with the Big 5 Rated from Different Points of View: Self-Rated, Other Rated and Faked

被引:51
作者
Ziegler, Matthias [1 ]
Danay, Erik
Schoelmerich, Franziska
Buehner, Markus [2 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Inst Psychol, D-10099 Berlin, Germany
[2] Karl Franzens Univ Graz, Graz, Austria
关键词
abilities and aptitudes; achievement; learning and memory; educational psychology; personality scales and inventories; specific aptitude theory; faking; INCREMENTAL VALIDITY; PERSONALITY; INTELLIGENCE; PERFORMANCE; SELECTION; TRAITS; FACETS; FAKING;
D O I
10.1002/per.753
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Self-ratings of personality predict academic success above general intelligence. The present study replicated these findings and investigated the increment of other-ratings or intentionally distorted self-ratings. Participants (N = 145) had to compile a personality questionnaire twice. First they were given neutral instructions. The second time they were asked to imagine a specific applicant setting. Furthermore, two peers rated each participant. Additionally, verbal, numerical and figural reasoning scores were obtained. Grades on a statistics exam obtained 2 months later served as the criterion. Results replicated prior findings and showed incremental validity for self- and other-rated personality, which was stable after controlling for intelligence. Faking had no impact on the domain-score level, but results on the facet-score level were less encouraging. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 355
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Amthauer R., 2001, I-S-T 2000 R-Intelligenz-Struktur-Test 2000 R [intelligence structure test 2000 R]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, NEO PI R NEO PERSONL
[4]   Joint factor analysis of the Personality Research Form and the Jackson Personality Inventory: Comparisons with the Big Five [J].
Ashton, MC ;
Jackson, DN ;
Helmes, E ;
Paunonen, SV .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 1998, 32 (02) :243-250
[5]   Perspectives on fluid and crystallized intelligence: facets for verbal, numerical, and figural intelligence [J].
Beauducel, A ;
Brocke, B ;
Liepmann, D .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (06) :977-994
[6]   Towards understanding assessments of the big five: Multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer [J].
Biesanz, JC ;
West, SG .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2004, 72 (04) :845-876
[7]   Personality and school performance: Incremental validity of self- and peer-ratings over intelligence [J].
Bratko, Denis ;
Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas ;
Saks, Zrnka .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2006, 41 (01) :131-142
[8]   Specific aptitude theory revisited: Is there incremental validity for training performance? [J].
Brown, Kenneth G. ;
Le, Huy ;
Schmidt, Frank L. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SELECTION AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 14 (02) :87-100
[9]  
Cohen J., 2003, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
[10]   DOMAINS AND FACETS - HIERARCHICAL PERSONALITY-ASSESSMENT USING THE REVISED NEO PERSONALITY-INVENTORY [J].
COSTA, PT ;
MCCRAE, RR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 1995, 64 (01) :21-50