Esophageal Magnetic Sphincter Augmentation as a Novel Approach to Post-bariatric Surgery Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
被引:18
作者:
Kuckelman, John P.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USAMadigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
Kuckelman, John P.
[1
]
Phillips, Cody J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USAMadigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
Phillips, Cody J.
[1
]
Derickson, Michael J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USAMadigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
Derickson, Michael J.
[1
]
Faler, Byron J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Eisenhower Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Augusta, GA USAMadigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
Faler, Byron J.
[2
]
Martin, Matthew J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USAMadigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
Martin, Matthew J.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Madigan Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, 9040-A Fitzsimmons Ave, Tacoma, WA 98431 USA
[2] Eisenhower Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Augusta, GA USA
Background We sought to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) in patients with GERD after bariatric surgery. Methods Pre- and post-operative GERD quality of life (G-QOL) surveys were conducted. Standard indications (SI) group or the post-bariatric group (PB) created. Outcomes were compared between groups. Results Twenty-eight patients analyzed with no losses to follow-up. All patients had preoperative testing confirming normal motility and presence of GERD. No patients were lost to follow-up. The PB group (N = 10) were mostly prior sleeve gastrectomies (N = 8) with two previous gastric bypasses. PB patients required larger MSA device size (16 beads) compared to the SI group (14 beads, p < 0.001). Outcomes were no different with percent improvement between pre- and post-operative G-QOL survey scores with 70% improvement for PB and 84% for SI (p = 0.13). Medication cessation was possible in 90% for PB versus 94% for SI (p = 0.99). Rates of post-operative dysphagia were similar between the two groups. Conclusions Although larger prospective randomized studies are needed, there is an exciting potential for the role of MSA, providing surgeons a new and much needed tool in their armamentarium against refractory or de novo GERD after bariatric procedures.