Reliability versus mass optimization of CO2 extraction technologies for long duration missions

被引:4
作者
Detrell, Gisela [1 ,2 ]
Griful i Ponsati, Eulalia [2 ]
Messerschmid, Ernst [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Space Syst, Pfaffenwaldring 29, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] UPC, ESEIAAT, Aerosp Sect, C Colom 11, E-08222 Terrassa, Spain
关键词
Reliability optimization; Long-duration missions; CO2; extraction; Spare parts;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2016.03.024
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to optimize reliability and mass of three CO2 extraction technologies/components: the 4-Bed Molecular Sieve, the Electrochemical Depolarized Concentrator and the Solid Amine Water Desorption. The first one is currently used in the International Space Station and the last two are being developed, and could be used for future long duration missions. This work is part of a complex study of the Environmental Control and Life Support System (ECLSS) reliability. The result of this paper is a methodology to analyze the reliability and mass at a component level, which is used in this paper for the CO2 extraction technologies, but that can be applied to the ECLSS technologies that perform other tasks, such as oxygen generation or water recycling, which will be a required input for the analysis of an entire ECLSS. The key parameter to evaluate any system to be used in space is mass, as it is directly related to the launch cost. Moreover, for long duration missions, reliability will play an even more important role, as no resupply or rescue mission is taken into consideration. Each technology is studied as a reparable system, where the number of spare parts to be taken for a specific mission will need to be selected, to maximize the reliability and minimize the mass of the system. The problem faced is a Multi-Objective Optimization Problem (MOOP), which does not have a single solution. Thus, optimum solutions of MOOP, the ones that cannot be improved in one of the two objectives, without degrading the other one, are found for each selected technology. The solutions of the MOOP for the three technologies are analyzed and compared, considering other parameters such as the type of mission, the maturity of the technology and potential interactions/synergies with other technologies of the ECLSS. (C) 2016 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2337 / 2346
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SYSTEM RELIABILITY T
[2]  
Belz S., 2010, 61 INT ASTR C PRAG C
[3]  
Detrell G., 2015, THESIS U STUTTGART G
[4]  
Detrell G., 2011, 41 INT C ENV SYST PO
[5]  
Drysdale A., 1996, 961498 SAE
[6]  
Eckart P., 1996, Spaceflight Life Support and Biospherics. Space Technology Library, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-3038-9_5, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-3038-9_5]
[7]  
ElSherif D., 2005, 2005012892 NASA
[8]  
European Power Supply Manufacturers Association, 2004, GUID UND REL PRED, V13
[9]  
Gitelson J. I., 2003, MAN MADE CLOSED ECOL
[10]  
Handford A.J., 2004, NASACR2004208941