Lens of the eye:: Radiation dose in balloon dacryocystoplasty

被引:20
作者
Ilgit, ET [1 ]
Meric, N
Bor, D
Öznur, I
Konus, O
Isik, S
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, TR-06510 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Ankara Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Phys, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
[3] Ankara Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Engn Phys, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
lacrimal gland and duct; interventional procedures; radiation; exposure to patients and personnel;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00oc0454
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the absorbed radiation dose to the lens of the eye, which is the critical organ in the primary beam during fluoroscopically guided transluminal balloon dilation of the lacrimal drainage system (balloon dacryocystoplasty) for obstructive epiphora and to evaluate the possibility of deterministic radiation effect on the lens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The radiation dose to the lens of the eye during balloon dacryocystoplasty (which includes pre- and postintervention dacryocystography) was measured in 10 consecutive patients by using thermoluminescent dosimeters on the lids of both eyes as close as possible to the lenses. A C-arm angiographic unit coupled with a digital imaging system was used, with similar exposure and geometric parameters in all cases. RESULTS: The mean radiation dose to the lens of the treated eye was 4.6 mGy +/- 2.2 (dose range, 1.9-9.1 mGy) and to that of the untreated eye was 38.5 mGy +/- 17.5 (dose range, 14.7-67.8 mGy). CONCLUSION: The lens of the untreated eye receives a higher dose than that of the treated eye because of its closer proximity to the x-ray tube in a lateral projection. In the lens, even the highest measured radiation dose (67.8 mGy) still was well below the deterministic threshold for lens opacity and cataract formation.
引用
收藏
页码:54 / 57
页数:4
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Annals of the ICRP, V21
[2]  
BERGERON P, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1809
[3]   Balloon dacryocystoplasty: Indications and contraindications [J].
Berkefeld, J ;
Kirchner, J ;
Muller, HM ;
Fries, U ;
Kollath, J .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (03) :785-790
[4]  
BERTHELSEN B, 1991, ACTA RADIOL, V32, P492
[5]   The lens is more sensitive to radiation than we had believed [J].
Brown, NP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 81 (04) :257-257
[6]  
BUSHONG SC, 1994, AM J NEURORADIOL, V15, P1813
[7]   OCULAR LENS DOSE IN CEREBRAL VASCULAR IMAGING [J].
CASSELDEN, PA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1988, 61 (723) :202-204
[8]  
GALLOWAY JE, 1984, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V91, P956
[9]  
Ilgit ET, 1996, AM J NEURORADIOL, V17, P657
[10]   TRANSLUMINAL BALLOON DILATATION OF THE LACRIMAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM FOR THE TREATMENT OF EPIPHORA [J].
ILGIT, ET ;
YUKSEL, D ;
UNAL, M ;
AKPEK, S ;
ISIK, S ;
HASANREISOGLU, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (06) :1517-1524