Comparison of Two Nonstationary Flood Frequency Analysis Methods within the Context of the Variable Regime in the Representative Polish Rivers

被引:22
作者
Strupczewski, Witold G. [1 ]
Kochanek, Krzysztof [1 ]
Bogdanowicz, Ewa [2 ]
Markiewicz, Iwona [1 ]
Feluch, Wojciech [3 ]
机构
[1] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Geophys, Warsaw 42, Poland
[2] Polish Acad Sci, Inst Geophys, Project CHIHE, Warsaw 42, Poland
[3] Warsaw Univ Technol, Dept Civil Engn Plock, Plock, Poland
关键词
non-stationary flood frequency analysis; maximum likelihood; covariance; two-stage methodology; L-moments; SEASONAL APPROACH; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PROBABILITY; LIKELIHOOD; SELECTION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1515/acgeo-2015-0070
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Changes in river flow regime resulted in a surge in the number of methods of non-stationary flood frequency analysis. Common assumption is the time-invariant distribution function with time-dependent location and scale parameters while the shape parameters are time-invariant. Here, instead of location and scale parameters of the distribution, the mean and standard deviation are used. We analyse the accuracy of the two methods in respect to estimation of time-dependent first two moments, time-invariant skewness and time-dependent upper quantiles. The method of maximum likelihood (ML) with time covariate is confronted with the Two Stage (TS) one (combining Weighted Least Squares and L-moments techniques). Comparison is made by Monte Carlo simulations. Assuming parent distribution which ensures the asymptotic superiority of ML method, the Generalized Extreme Value distribution with various values of linearly changing in time first two moments, constant skewness, and various time-series lengths are considered. Analysis of results indicates the superiority of TS methods in all analyzed aspects. Moreover, the estimates from TS method are more resistant to probability distribution choice, as demonstrated by Polish rivers' case studies.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 236
页数:31
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   NEW LOOK AT STATISTICAL-MODEL IDENTIFICATION [J].
AKAIKE, H .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 1974, AC19 (06) :716-723
[2]  
[Anonymous], MITTEILUNGSBLATT HYD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1975, J. Econ
[4]  
[Anonymous], ACTA GEOPHYS POLONIC
[5]   Fitting and testing the significance of linear trends in Gumbel-distributed data [J].
Clarke, RT .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2002, 6 (01) :17-24
[6]   Estimating time trends in Gumbel-distributed data by means of generalized linear models [J].
Clarke, RT .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2002, 38 (07) :16-1
[7]  
DAVISON AC, 1990, J ROY STAT SOC B MET, V52, P393
[8]  
Feluch W., 1994, SELECTED METHODS KER
[9]   Understanding flood regime changes in Europe: a state-of-the-art assessment [J].
Hall, J. ;
Arheimer, B. ;
Borga, M. ;
Brazdil, R. ;
Claps, P. ;
Kiss, A. ;
Kjeldsen, T. R. ;
Kriauciuniene, J. ;
Kundzewicz, Z. W. ;
Lang, M. ;
Llasat, M. C. ;
Macdonald, N. ;
McIntyre, N. ;
Mediero, L. ;
Merz, B. ;
Merz, R. ;
Molnar, P. ;
Montanari, A. ;
Neuhold, C. ;
Parajka, J. ;
Perdigao, R. A. P. ;
Plavcova, L. ;
Rogger, M. ;
Salinas, J. L. ;
Sauquet, E. ;
Schaer, C. ;
Szolgay, J. ;
Viglione, A. ;
Bloeschl, G. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (07) :2735-2772
[10]   Climatological drivers of changes in flood hazard in Germany [J].
Hattermann, Fred F. ;
Kundzewicz, Zbigniew W. ;
Huang, Shaochun ;
Vetter, Tobias ;
Gerstengarbe, Friedrich-Wilhelm ;
Werner, Peter .
ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2013, 61 (02) :463-477