An Examination of the Relationship Between Intellectual Development and Learning Preferences in Electrical and Computer Engineering (Ongoing)

被引:0
作者
Hill, Askia [1 ]
Brown, Cordelia M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Elect & Comp Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Engn Educ, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
来源
2013 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE | 2013年
关键词
KNOWLEDGE; BELIEFS; STUDENTS; VALIDITY; SCIENCE; INDEX;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Engineering educators have used the evaluation of students' learning preferences as a way to improve academic performance and the overall classroom experience. This paper discusses an ongoing study that examines the link between the learning preferences and the intellectual development of engineering students. It further seeks to examine to what extent do students with particular learning preferences undergo a higher degree of intellectual development through an engineering curriculum. Electrical and computer engineering students at a large Midwestern university completed inventories with respect to intellectual development (Learning Environment Preference) and learning styles (Index of Learning Styles) in order to establish their level of intellectual development and their learning style. Preliminary results show that specific learning styles achieve higher intellectual development assessment scores and the degree of preference for a learning style is a factor in the intellectual development as it relates to the assessment scores.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
[2]   Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment [J].
Berg, CAR ;
Christina, V ;
Bergendahl, B ;
Lundberg, BKS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2003, 25 (03) :351-372
[3]   Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? [J].
Buehl, MM ;
Alexander, PA ;
Murphy, PK .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 27 (03) :415-449
[4]  
Cassidy S., 2004, EDUC PSYCHOL-UK, V24, P419, DOI DOI 10.1080/0144341042000228834
[5]  
Culver R., 1994, Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ, V4, P257
[6]  
Felder R., INDEX LEARNING STYLE
[7]  
Felder R.M., 1995, J. Engr. Education, V84, P361, DOI DOI 10.1002/J.2168-9830.1995.TB00191.X
[8]   Understanding student differences [J].
Felder, RM ;
Brent, R .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2005, 94 (01) :57-72
[9]  
Felder RM, 2005, INT J ENG EDUC, V21, P103
[10]   The intellectual development of science and engineering students. Part 2: Teaching to promote growth [J].
Felder, RM ;
Brent, R .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2004, 93 (04) :279-291