Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PEER-U scale

被引:2
作者
Akca, Emine [1 ]
Surucu, Sule Gokyildiz [2 ]
Sanberk, Ismail [3 ]
机构
[1] Inonu Univ, Midwifery Dept, Fac Hlth Sci, Malatya, Turkey
[2] Cukurova Univ, Midwifery Dept, Fac Hlth Sci, Adana, Turkey
[3] Cukurova Univ, Dept Educ Sci, Fac Educ, Adana, Turkey
关键词
PEER-U; pregnancy; ultrasound; validity-reliability; Turkey; ROUTINE ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION; EXPERIENCES; COHERENCE; SENSE;
D O I
10.1080/02646838.2019.1584667
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background: Antenatal care is necessary for mother and infant by reducing or eliminating the risks which may occur in the antenatal and postnatal period. Ultrasound is one of the most commonly used examination methods in antenatal monitoring. Evaluating the expectations, experiences and reactions of both parents during routine ultrasound examinations is essential to provide the best antenatal care. Objective: This study aims to test the validity and reliability of the PEER-U scale developed for Sweden by Ekelin et al. Method: The PEER-U scale consists of before and after ultrasound scales. Four hundred and thirty-six parents participated in the study. Interviews were conducted with all participating parents in a private room 15 minutes before and five minutes after the ultrasound. Researchers analysed the PEER-U scale for language, content, construct, criterion-referenced validity and internal consistency reliability. Results: The Turkish version of PEER-U has 21 items in the before ultrasound scale and 21 items in the after ultrasound scale. Cronbach's alpha was 0.65 for the before ultrasound scale and 0.89 for the after ultrasound scale. Conclusion: The study determined that the Turkish version of the PEER-U scale is a valid and reliable scale for Turkish society.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 512
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A literature update on maternal-fetal attachment [J].
Alhusen, Jeanne L. .
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2008, 37 (03) :315-328
[2]  
Alpar R., 2016, APPL STAT VALIDITY R, P502
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES
[4]   THE STRUCTURE AND PROPERTIES OF THE SENSE OF COHERENCE SCALE [J].
ANTONOVSKY, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1993, 36 (06) :725-733
[5]  
Antonovsky A., 1983, Newsletter and Research Reports W.S. Schwartz Research Center of Behavioral Medicine, V1, P1
[6]  
ANTONOVSKY H, 1986, J SOC PSYCHOL, V126, P213
[7]   TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS [J].
Bartlett, M. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-STATISTICAL SECTION, 1950, 3 :77-85
[8]  
Buyukozturk S., 2002, Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, P470
[9]  
Capik C., 2014, Anadolu Hemsirelik ve Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, V17, P196
[10]  
Celik H. E., 2016, STRUCTURAL EQUATION, P23