Optical simulation of a central receiver system: Comparison of different software tools

被引：50

作者：

Jafrancesco, David ^{[1
]}

Cardoso, Joao P. ^{[2
]}

Mutuberria, Amaia ^{[3
]}

Leonardi, Erminia ^{[4
]}

Les, Inigo ^{[3
]}

Sansoni, Paola ^{[1
]}

Francini, Franco ^{[1
]}

Fontani, Daniela ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] CNR, INO Natl Inst Opt, Largo E Fermi 6, I-50125 Florence, Italy

[2] Lab Nacl Energia & Geol IP, Estr Paco Lumiar 22, P-1649038 Lisbon, Portugal

[3] Ctr Nacl Energias Renovables, Ciudad Innovac 7, Navarra 31621, Spain

[4] PST Polaris, CRS4, Edificio 1, I-09010 Pula, CA, Italy

来源：

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2018年 / 94卷

关键词：

Central receiver system; Optical modeling; Heliostat field; Concentrating Solar Power; Simulation; HELIOSTAT FIELDS; SOLAR; CSP;

D O I：

10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.028

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Heliostat field layout design is a critical task in solar tower power plant construction due to its impact in the final plant efficiency and cost. The complexity of these systems and the high number of parameters to define during the field design stage demand the use of suitable simulation tools to compare different design options and evaluate the final performance of the heliostat field. This work concerns a comparison of some of the most common tools used for the heliostat field layout design and analysis, aiming to help Concentrating Solar Power researchers and industry by providing more information regarding the tools comparative results and features. A brief review of available tools is presented, including an extended description of some of them - Tonatiuh, SolTrace, TracePro and CRS4-2. A qualitative comparison of these four tools is performed focusing on functionality and usability. A quantitative comparison is done providing simulation results for a test-case, the SPSS-CRS facility located at Plataforma Solar de Almeria in Spain. In general, the results for total power and maximum irradiance are in good agreement across most tools. The total power values are very close for Tonatiuh, SolTrace and CRS4-2. Apart from the designer preferences, the choice of the most suitable tool depends on the specific application and requirements.

引用

页码：792 / 803

页数：12

共 45 条

[11] Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields [J].

Collado, Francisco J. ;

Guallar, Jesus .

RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 46 :49-59

[12]

Crespo L, 2009, P SOLARPACES 2009 15

[13] Review of software for optical analyzing and optimizing heliostat fields [J].

Cruz, N. C. ;

Redondo, J. L. ;

Berenguel, M. ;

Alvarez, J. D. ;

Ortigosa, P. M. .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 72 :1001-1018

[14] Monte Carlo advances and concentrated solar applications [J].

Delatorre, J. ;

Baud, G. ;

Bezian, J. J. ;

Blanco, S. ;

Caliot, C. ;

Cornet, J. F. ;

Coustet, C. ;

Dauchet, J. ;

El Hafi, M. ;

Eymet, V. ;

Fournier, R. ;

Gautrais, J. ;

Gourmel, O. ;

Joseph, D. ;

Meilhac, N. ;

Pajot, A. ;

Paulin, M. ;

Perez, P. ;

Piaud, B. ;

Roger, M. ;

Rolland, J. ;

Veynandt, F. ;

Weitz, S. .

SOLAR ENERGY, 2014, 103 :653-681

[15]

Denk T, 2012, P 18 INT S SOL POW C

[16]

Dilip J.S., 2013, INT J ADV RES, V1, P367

[17] The value of CSP with thermal energy storage in providing grid stability [J].

Forrester, J. .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOLARPACES 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2014, 49 :1632-1641

[18] Codes for solar flux calculation dedicated to central receiver system applications: A comparative review [J].

Garcia, Pierre ;

Ferriere, Alain ;

Bezian, Jean-Jacques .

SOLAR ENERGY, 2008, 82 (03) :189-197

[19] SoFiA - A novel simulation tool for Central Receiver Systems [J].

Gertig, C. ;

Delgado, A. ;

Hidalgo, C. ;

Ron, R. .

PROCEEDINGS OF THE SOLARPACES 2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2014, 49 :1361-1370

[20]

Henault F, COSAC MANUAL

← 1 2 3 4 5 →