Vasopressor Administration via Peripheral Intravenous Access for Emergency Department Stabilization in Septic Shock Patients

被引:0
作者
Kilian, Scott [1 ]
Surrey, Aaron [2 ]
McCarron, Weston [1 ]
Mueller, Kristen [3 ]
Wessman, Brian Todd [4 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Barnes Jewish Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, St Louis, MO USA
[2] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Div Crit Care Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Emergency Med, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
Central venous line; Extravasation; Norepinephrine; Peripheral vasopressors; Septic shock; SKIN NECROSIS; VENOUS CATHETER; SEVERE SEPSIS; NOREPINEPHRINE; EXTRAVASATION; MORTALITY; INFUSION; SAFETY; COMPLICATION;
D O I
10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24243
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Septic shock is commonly treated in the emergency department (ED) with vasopressors. Prior data have shown that vasopressor administration through a peripheral intravenous line (PIV) is feasible. Objectives: To characterize vasopressor administration for patients presenting to an academic ED in septic shock. Materials and methods: Retrospective observational cohort study evaluating initial vasopressor administration for septic shock. ED patients from June 2018 to May 2019 were screened. Exclusion criteria included other shock states, hospital transfers, or heart failure history. Patient demographics, vasopressor data, and length of stay (LOS) were collected. Cases were grouped by initiation site: PIV, ED placed central line (ED-CVL), or tunneled port/indwelling central line (Prior-CVL). Results: Of the 136 patients identified, 69 were included. Vasopressors were initiated via PIV in 49%, ED-CVL in 25%, and prior-CVL in 26%. The time to initiation was 214.8 minutes in PIV and 294.7 minutes in ED-CVL (p = 0.240). Norepinephrine predominated all groups. No extravasation or ischemic complications were identified with PIV vasopressor administration. Twenty-eight-day mortality was 20.6% for PIV, 17.6% for ED-CVL, and 61.1% for prior-CVL. Of 28-day survivors, ICU LOS was 4.44 for PIV and 4.86 for ED-CVL (p = 0.687), while vasopressor days were 2.26 for PIV and 3.14 for ED-CVL (p = 0.050). Conclusion: Vasopressors are being administered via PIVs for ED septic shock patients. Norepinephrine comprised the majority of initial PIV vasopressor administration. There were no documented episodes of extravasation or ischemia. Further studies should look at the duration of PIV administration with potential avoidance of central venous cannulation altogether in appropriate patients.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 815
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intravenous immunoglobulin use in septic shock patients after emergency laparotomy
    Tagami, Takashi
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2015, 71 (02) : 158 - 166
  • [22] DOES EARLY AND APPROPRIATE ANTIBIOTIC ADMINISTRATION IMPROVE MORTALITY IN EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT PATIENTS WITH SEVERE SEPSIS OR SEPTIC SHOCK?
    Sherwin, Robert
    Winters, Michael E.
    Vilke, Gary M.
    Wardi, Gabriel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (04) : 588 - 595
  • [23] Impact of timely antibiotic administration on outcomes in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department
    Joo, Young Min
    Chae, Minjung Kathy
    Hwang, Sung Yeon
    Jin, Sang-Chan
    Lee, Tae Rim
    Cha, Won Chul
    Jo, Ik Joon
    Sim, Min Seob
    Song, Keun Jeong
    Jeong, Yeon Kwon
    Shin, Tae Gun
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 1 (01): : 35 - 40
  • [24] Presentation and outcomes of end stage liver disease patients presenting with septic shock to the emergency department
    Okonkwo, Enola
    Rozario, Nigel
    Heffner, Alan C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2020, 38 (07) : 1408 - 1413
  • [25] Machine learning for prediction of septic shock at initial triage in emergency department
    Kim, Joonghee
    Chang, HyungLan
    Kim, Doyun
    Jang, Dong-Hyun
    Park, Inwon
    Kim, Kyuseok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 55 : 163 - 170
  • [26] Outcome of delayed resuscitation bundle achievement in emergency department patients with septic shock
    Chang Hwan Sohn
    Seung Mok Ryoo
    Dong Woo Seo
    Jae Ho Lee
    Bum Jin Oh
    Kyoung Soo Lim
    Jin Won Huh
    Won Young Kim
    [J]. Internal and Emergency Medicine, 2014, 9 : 671 - 676
  • [27] Effect of timing of norepinephrine administration on prognosis of patients with septic shock: A prospective cohort study
    Li, Yuting
    Zhang, Deyou
    Li, Hongxiang
    Wang, Youquan
    Zhang, Dong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE MEDICINE, 2025, 5 (02): : 160 - 166
  • [28] Relative Bradycardia in Patients With Septic Shock Requiring Vasopressor Therapy
    Beesley, Sarah J.
    Wilson, Emily L.
    Lanspa, Michael J.
    Grissom, Colin K.
    Shahul, Sajid
    Talmor, Daniel
    Brown, Samuel M.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (02) : 225 - 233
  • [29] Performance of illness severity scores to guide disposition of emergency department patients with severe sepsis or septic shock
    de Groot, Bas
    de Deckere, Ernie R. J. T.
    Flameling, Roos
    Sandel, Maro H.
    Vis, Alice
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2012, 19 (05) : 316 - 322
  • [30] Clinical usefulness of NT-proBNP as a prognostic factor for septic shock patients presenting to the emergency department
    Choi, Yunhyung
    Lee, Jae Hee
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):