Linked color imaging improves the visibility of various featured colorectal polyps in an endoscopist's visibility and color difference value

被引:40
作者
Yoshida, Naohisa [1 ]
Naito, Yuji [1 ]
Yasuda, Ritsu [1 ]
Murakami, Takaaki [1 ]
Hirose, Ryohei [1 ]
Ogiso, Kiyoshi [1 ]
Inada, Yutaka [1 ]
Dohi, Osamu [1 ]
Kamada, Kazuhiro [1 ]
Uchiyama, Kazuhiko [1 ]
Handa, Osamu [1 ]
Konishi, Hideyuki [1 ]
Rani, Rafiz Abdul [2 ]
Kishimoto, Mitsuo [3 ]
Konishi, Eiichi [3 ]
Itoh, Yoshito [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Mol Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Kamigyo Ku, 465 Kajii Cho,Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kyoto 6028566, Japan
[2] Univ Teknol MARA, Gastroenterol Unit, Fac Med, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Kyoto Prefectural Univ Med, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg Pathol, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
Linked color imaging; Colorectal polyp; Visibility; Color difference; Diminutive polyp; COLONOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; ADENOMA DETECTION; DIAGNOSIS; SYSTEM; TRIAL; VIDEO; PREVENTION; EFFICACY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-017-2855-z
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Linked color imaging (LCI) by laser endoscopy is a novel narrow band light observation. In this study, we analyzed the efficacy of LCI for improving the various featured colorectal polyp's visibility utilizing a subjective endoscopist's visibility scoring and objective color difference (CD) value. Methods We retrospectively reviewed two pictures both with white light (WL) and LCI for 54 consecutive neoplastic polyps 2-20 mm in size. All pictures were evaluated by four endoscopists according to a published polyp visibility score from four (excellent visibility) to one (poor visibility). Additionally, we calculated CD value between each polyp and surrounding mucosa in LCI and WL using an original software. Results The mean polyp visibility scores of LCI (3.11 +/- 1.05) were significantly higher than those of WL (2.50 +/- 1.09, P < 0.001). The ratio of an endoscopist's poor visibility (polyp visibility scores 1 and 2) was significantly lower in LCI (27.9%) than WL (55.6%, P < 0.001). With respect to the CD analysis, the CD value of LCI was significantly higher than that of WL (33.3 +/- 13.9 vs. 20.7 +/- 13.6, P < 0.001). In a subgroup analysis, the polyp visibility scores and CD values of LCI about 24 diminutive polyps (5 mm) were higher than those of WL (3.29 +/- 0.99 vs. 2.12 +/- 0.99, P < 0.001; 31.6 +/- 12.8 vs. 14.7 +/- 7.6, P < 0.001). Additionally, the polyp visibility scores and CD values of LCI for polyps with any location, size, histology, and morphology were significantly higher than those of WL. Conclusions LCI improved the various featured polyp's visibility compared to WL in both polyp visibility scores and CD value.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1260
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection:: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? [J].
Adler, A. ;
Pohl, H. ;
Papanikolaou, I. S. ;
Abou-Rebyeh, H. ;
Schachschal, G. ;
Veltzke-Schlieker, W. ;
Khalifa, A. C. ;
Setka, E. ;
Koch, M. ;
Wiedenmann, B. ;
Roesch, T. .
GUT, 2008, 57 (01) :59-64
[2]  
[Anonymous], GASTROINTEST ENDOS S
[3]   Virtual chromoendoscopy (I-SCAN) detects more polyps in patients with Lynch syndrome: a randomized controlled crossover trial [J].
Bisschops, Raf ;
Tejpar, Sabine ;
Willekens, Hilde ;
De Hertogh, Gert ;
Van Cutsem, Eric .
ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (04) :342-350
[4]   Cap cuff-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for adenoma detection: a randomized back-to-back study [J].
De Palma, Giovanni D. ;
Giglio, Mariano C. ;
Bruzzese, Dario ;
Gennarelli, Nicola ;
Maione, Francesco ;
Siciliano, Saverio ;
Manzo, Benedetta ;
Cassese, Gianluca ;
Luglio, Gaetano .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (01) :232-240
[5]   Linked color imaging improves endoscopic diagnosis of active Helicobacter pylori infection [J].
Dohi, Osamu ;
Yagi, Nobuaki ;
Onozawa, Yuriko ;
Kimura-Tsuchiya, Reiko ;
Majima, Atsushi ;
Kitaichi, Tomoko ;
Horii, Yusuke ;
Suzuki, Kentaro ;
Tomie, Akira ;
Okayama, Tetsuya ;
Yoshida, Naohisa ;
Kamada, Kazuhiro ;
Katada, Kazuhiro ;
Uchiyama, Kazuhiko ;
Ishikawa, Takeshi ;
Takagi, Tomohisa ;
Handa, Osamu ;
Konishi, Hideyuki ;
Naito, Yuji ;
Itoh, Yoshito .
ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2016, 4 (07) :E800-E805
[6]   Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384
[7]   Efficacy of segmental re-examination of proximal colon for adenoma detection during colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Guo, Chuan-Guo ;
Zhang, Feifei ;
Ji, Rui ;
Li, Yueyue ;
Li, Lixiang ;
Zuo, Xiu-Li ;
Li, Yan-Qing .
ENDOSCOPY, 2017, 49 (03) :243-250
[8]  
Hamilton SR, 2010, Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system, P104
[9]   Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Sharma, VK ;
de Garmo, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) :76-79
[10]   Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps:: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies [J].
Heresbach, D. ;
Barrioz, T. ;
Lapalus, M. G. ;
Coumaros, D. ;
Bauret, P. ;
Potier, P. ;
Sautereau, D. ;
Boustiere, C. ;
Grimaud, J. C. ;
Barthelemy, C. ;
See, J. ;
Serraj, I. ;
Halluin, P. N. D. ;
Branger, B. ;
Ponchan, T. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (04) :284-290