An algebraic approach to belief contraction and nonmonotonic entailment

被引:0
作者
Flax, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
来源
LOGICS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS | 2004年 / 3229卷
关键词
D O I
10.1007/978-3-540-30227-8_37
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The approach of Alchourron, Gardenfors and Makinson to belief contraction is treated algebraically. This is then used to give an algebraic treatment of nonmonotonic entailment in the context of a belief set. The algebra used is a preboolean algebra whose elements are sets of sentences and whose order relation is restricted entailment. Under plausible assumptions restricted entailment is computable; so I have proposed elsewhere [4] that restricted entailment be taken as the deductive process of an agent. It can also be shown (not here) that ordinary entailment can be retrieved from the family of entailments with finite restrictions. Nonmonotonic closure satisfies inclusion, supraclassicality and distribution, but satisfaction of idempotency and cumulativity depend on certain conditions being fulfilled. Casting the notions of belief contraction and nonmonotonic entailment in algebraic formalism facilitates the understanding and analysis of these ideas.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 451
页数:13
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1988, KNOWLEDGE FLUX
  • [2] A power algebra for theory change
    Britz K.
    [J]. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 1999, 8 (4) : 429 - 443
  • [3] CAMERON PJ, 1999, SETS LOGIC CATEGORIE
  • [4] EBBINGHAUS H. D., 1984, MATH LOGIC
  • [5] FLAX L, 2003, DECLARATIVE AGENT LA
  • [6] Gardenfors P., 1995, HDB LOGIC ARTIFICIAL, V4, P35
  • [7] Hansson SO, 1999, A Textbook of Belief Dynamics: Theory Change and Database Updating
  • [8] Hodges W., 1997, A Shorter Model Theory
  • [9] Makinson D., 1994, HDB LOGIC ARTIFICIAL, P35
  • [10] SHOHAN Y, 1987, REASONING CHANGE TIM